首页> 外文会议>International Technology,Education and Development Conference >(1193)SCHOOL KNOWLEDGE OF BOTANY IN TEXTBOOKS OF NATURALSCIENCES IN PORTUGAL. ANALYSIS OF ITS CURRICULARSTATUTE IN PRIMARY SCHOOL EDUCATION (1900-2000)
【24h】

(1193)SCHOOL KNOWLEDGE OF BOTANY IN TEXTBOOKS OF NATURALSCIENCES IN PORTUGAL. ANALYSIS OF ITS CURRICULARSTATUTE IN PRIMARY SCHOOL EDUCATION (1900-2000)

机译:(1193)葡萄牙Naturalsciences教科书中的Botany学校知识。小学教育课程课程分析(1900-2000)

获取原文

摘要

This research paper has as its main aim the understanding of the place that Botany wasgiven in textbooks of Natural Sciences used in Primary School Education in the lastcentury in Portugal. In an attempt to interpret the shifts in the content approach forBotany, didactical books of the chosen educational level have been studied according toeleven principles: Form, Kingdoms, Classification, Organs, Roots, Stem, Leaf, Flower,Fruit, Reproduction and Dimensions. This study, based on a qualitative methodologicalapproach, is supported by a content analysis and the establishment of a posterioricategories, as well as a cluster analysis through the construction of dendograms. Theselatter constructions were intended to promote the comparison of first hand sources –textbooks – in which content, pedagogical and didactical orientations, as well aseducational and curricular policy recommendations are concerned and educational andscientific values suggested.Textbooks are of great importance to schools and teaching especially in relation to theirstructural arrangement of the forms and content of pedagogical knowledge, includingaspects related to the sequencing and rhythm of the transmission of knowledge through,for instance, activities that promote and evaluate the forms of knowledge acquired and inthis way develop important pedagogical functions. Textbooks, therefore, can allow accessto knowledge about the pedagogical ideology on which they are based, to the way theteaching and learning process that happens in the classroom is understood and to theroles that are developed by pupils and teachers.Data analysis shows that changes have occurred in the naming of the teaching of NaturalSciences and in the contents approached, which have assumed different relevancethrough time. Therefore, one may find the de-complexification, the dichotomisation, thede-conceptualisation and the conservation of various botanical contents distributedthroughout different botanic dimensions;namely, the notional dimension, themorphological dimension, the functional dimension and the ecological dimension.
机译:本研究论文的主要旨在了解植物学在葡萄牙初学教育中使用的自然科学教科书中的植物学专业的地方。在尝试解释内容方法中的转变,所选择的教育水平的教学书籍已经根据艰难的原则研究:形式,王国,分类,器官,根,茎,叶,花,果实,繁殖和尺寸。本研究基于定性方法PologicalAploCh,由内容分析和建立后脑,以及通过施工Dendogres的集群分析。 TheSelatter建筑旨在促进第一手资源的比较 - 提出内容,教学和教学方向,以及课程和课程政策建议,涉及和教育和科学价值观.TextBooks对学校和教学特别重要与教学知识的形式和内容的形式和内容的结构的关系,包括通过例如促进和评估所获得的知识形式和Inthis方式的知识传播和知识传播的排序和节奏相关的追求。因此,教科书可以允许访问关于他们所在的教学意识形态的知识,以课堂发生在课堂上发生的转移和学习过程的方式被理解并由学生和教师开发的威胁.DATA分析表明发生了变化在命名Naturalsciences的教学中,并在接近的内容中,这引起了不同的相关性时间。因此,人们可以找到脱络,二分法,对抗概念化和各种植物内容的保护,分配不同的植物尺寸;即,题尺寸,题言尺寸,功能尺寸和生态尺寸。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号