首页> 外文OA文献 >Two Types of Economic Growth in Asia : Chinese Development along the East Asian Path and Indian Development with a Stratified Social Structure
【2h】

Two Types of Economic Growth in Asia : Chinese Development along the East Asian Path and Indian Development with a Stratified Social Structure

机译:亚洲的两种经济增长类型:中国在东亚道路上的发展和印度具有分层社会结构的发展

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Following other countries in East Asia that have achieved the u22East Asian Miracleu22, China has been successfully developing its economy after the agrarian and economic reforms starting in 1978. A little later, in the 1980s, another giant Asian country, India, also started along the road of high-rate economic growth. While the two Asian giants share many common features, they also differ in some important aspects in their developmental processes. In this paper, we have compared Indian and Chinese economies in connection with the structure of rural society. Discussing initial conditions for economic development, we have pointed to the fact that the polarized socio-economic structure of Indian society basically remained unchanged. In the period between 1950 and the 1970s, the Chinese economy witnessed a labour-intensive type of agricultural development, whereas in India, village society remained stratified and agricultural development was led by the rich peasant groups. In China, the rapid expansion of rural markets provided the grounds on which rural small-scale industries and enterprises grew rapidly, creating a base on which export-connected industries could later develop. In India also, the weakening of hierarchical control in polarized village society, together with an increase in agrarian production and rural surpluses, led to the considerable expansion of consumption by rural households of various classes, including the lower. This created a remarkable growth in demand for consumer durables and formed one of the vital elements resulting in the economic growth of the 1980s. At the same time, these could not radically change the basic structure of Indian rural society, and therefore about one-fifth of the rural population remained below the poverty line. They would not be able to participate in the opportunities created by economic growth. The chance to earn non-agricultural income is not equally provided to all sections of the population in India. The labour market in Ind
机译:继东亚其他国家实现“东亚奇迹”之后,中国自1978年开始进行土地和经济改革以来,已经成功地发展了其经济。不久之后的1980年代,另一个亚洲大国印度也沿着经济高速增长的道路开始。尽管这两个亚洲巨人具有许多共同特征,但它们在发展过程中的一些重要方面也有所不同。在本文中,我们将印度和中国的经济与农村社会结构进行了比较。在讨论经济发展的初始条件时,我们指出了印度社会两极分化的社会经济结构基本保持不变的事实。在1950年至1970年代期间,中国经济经历了劳动密集型的农业发展,而在印度,乡村社会仍处于分层状态,农业发展由富裕农民团体主导。在中国,农村市场的迅速扩张为农村小规模工业和企业的迅速发展奠定了基础,为以后与出口相关的产业发展奠定了基础。同样在印度,两极分化的乡村社会中等级控制的削弱,加上农业生产和农村剩余的增加,导致包括低等在内的各种阶层的农村家庭的消费大量增加。这导致对耐用消费品需求的显着增长,并成为导致1980年代经济增长的重要因素之一。同时,这些并不能从根本上改变印度农村社会的基本结构,因此,大约五分之一的农村人口仍处于贫困线以下。他们将无法参与经济增长所创造的机会。并非所有印度人口都能平等地获得非农业收入。印度的劳动力市场

著录项

  • 作者

    Yanagisawa Haruka;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号