首页> 外文OA文献 >The Nature of the Relationships between Social Networks, Interpersonal Trust, Management Support, and Knowledge Sharing
【2h】

The Nature of the Relationships between Social Networks, Interpersonal Trust, Management Support, and Knowledge Sharing

机译:社交网络,人际信任,管理支持和知识共享之间的关系的性质

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Purpose – Past research has shown that, by implementing knowledge sharing, an organisation can maintain its long-term competitive advantage. Hence, this research will explore the nature of the relationships between social networks, interpersonal trust, management support, and knowledge sharing. Methodology/approach – In order to achieve the above purpose, semi-structured interviews were used to gather qualitative data. Interviewee participants included top and middle managers and frontline employees. The total number of participants included in the research was 25, equally representing five companies. The core business of all the companies was large-scale manufacturing. A grounded theory approach was used to analyse the data, augmented by the computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software, Nvivo.Findings – The results reveal that social networks facilitate knowledge sharing in diverse ways. These ways are: the use of multiple communication styles, brainstorming and problem solving, learning and teaching, training, employee rotation, and consultation. In addition, the data from the interviews suggests that, through various factors, the level of interpersonal trust, influences the extent to which employees are willing to share knowledge. These factors are organisational, relational, and individual factors. Furthermore, this study shows that both middle and top managers can play significant roles in facilitating knowledge sharing between employees. These roles are: encouragement of participation in decision-making, provision of recognition, breaking down of barriers, building up of teams, providing training or assigning others to do training, encouragement of training, communication, learning, putting knowledge into practice in the form of processes, and movement of employees.Research contributions – Six models were developed from the qualitative analysis of the field data. The brainstorming and problem solving model identifies various steps for brainstorming and problem solving which influence social networks and knowledge sharing. The model of learning and teaching explains how social networks can be built based on the receivers’ levels of knowledge, namely, the novice, competent, expert, and proficient levels. The model of factors influencing social networks and knowledge sharing illustrates various factors. These are: using multiple communication strategies, brainstorming and problem solving, learning and teaching, training, employee rotation, and consultation. The model of factors influencing interpersonal trust describes three factors for achieving such trust: organisational, relational, and individual factors. This model also elaborates on three factors that negatively influence interpersonal trust. These are division between departments, team conflict, and a sense of vulnerability. The model of the role of management teams in encouraging participation in decision-making elaborates on levels of decision-making among employees and the way in which knowledge flows between top and middle management and frontline employees. The integrative model deciphers the relationships between social networks, interpersonal trust, management support, openness, and knowledge sharing. In addition, the relationships between each area of emphasis and knowledge sharing are included in the model. Based on this model, a survey questionnaire was developed.These models provide new insights into the relationships between social networks, interpersonal trust, management support, and knowledge sharing. By applying these models to appropriate field situations, both practitioners and academics may be able to improve current practices relating to how knowledge is shared and evolves within organisations.
机译:目的–过去的研究表明,通过实施知识共享,组织可以维持其长期竞争优势。因此,本研究将探索社交网络,人际信任,管理支持和知识共享之间关系的性质。方法/方法–为了实现上述目的,使用了半结构化访谈来收集定性数据。受访者包括高层和中层管理人员以及一线员工。参与研究的参与者总数为25,平均代表五家公司。所有公司的核心业务都是大规模生产。使用了扎实的理论方法来分析数据,并辅以计算机辅助的定性数据分析软件Nvivo.Findings –结果表明,社交网络以多种方式促进了知识共享。这些方法是:使用多种沟通方式,集思广益和解决问题,学与教,培训,员工轮换和咨询。此外,访谈的数据表明,通过各种因素,人际信任程度会影响员工愿意共享知识的程度。这些因素是组织,关系和个人因素。此外,这项研究表明,中层和高层管理人员在促进员工之间的知识共享方面都可以发挥重要作用。这些角色是:鼓励参与决策,提供认可,打破障碍,组建团队,提供培训或指派其他人进行培训,鼓励培训,交流,学习,以形式将知识付诸实践研究贡献–通过对现场数据的定性分析开发了六个模型。头脑风暴和问题解决模型确定了影响社会网络和知识共享的头脑风暴和问题解决的各个步骤。学与教的模式说明了如何根据接收者的知识水平(即新手,主管,专家和熟练水平)构建社交网络。影响社交网络和知识共享的因素模型说明了各种因素。它们是:使用多种沟通策略,集体讨论和解决问题,学与教,培训,员工轮换和咨询。影响人际信任的因素模型描述了实现这种信任的三个因素:组织因素,关系因素和个人因素。该模型还阐述了对人际信任产生负面影响的三个因素。这些是部门之间的划分,团队冲突和脆弱感。管理团队在鼓励参与决策中的作用模型详细说明了员工之间的决策水平以及高层管理人员和中层管理人员与一线员工之间的知识流动方式。集成模型解释了社交网络,人际信任,管理支持,开放性和知识共享之间的关系。此外,模型中还包括每个重点领域和知识共享之间的关系。在此模型的基础上,开发了调查问卷,这些模型为社交网络,人际信任,管理支持和知识共享之间的关系提供了新的见解。通过将这些模型应用于适当的现场情况,从业者和学者都可以改善与组织内部知识的共享和发展有关的当前实践。

著录项

  • 作者

    Al Saifi Said Abdullah;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号