首页> 外文OA文献 >Anesthesia Clinical Performance Outcomes: Does Teaching Methodology Make A Difference?
【2h】

Anesthesia Clinical Performance Outcomes: Does Teaching Methodology Make A Difference?

机译:麻醉的临床表现结果:教学方法是否有所作为?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Researchers have studied memory recall of crisis-oriented or emotional events in non-educational settings. However, within the health care field, there has been a limited study of the the concept of recall of crisis oriented or emotional events inu26 health care education. Crisis-oriented events such as natural disasters, acts of bioterroism, and industrial accidents, have been reported to impact memory. Patient safety is a primary focus in anesthesia education, appropriate crisis management is imperative to quality anesthesia care. Due to the critical nature of anesthesia delivery, there is a strong, constant need to develop methods that will enhance, support, and improve current anesthesia practices that impact patient safety. Educational methodologies used by both clinical and didactic instructors that will improve teaching effectiveness need to be investigated to ensure that patient safety content is being delivered to nurse anesthesia students in a manner consistent with the American Association of Nurse Anesthetists (AANAs) Council on Accreditationu27s COAs) standards of care. Utilizing a simulated anesthesia crisis situation, this study compared the differences in cognitive imprinting and application to practice between two content delivery methods, the written case study and patient safety vignettes, in nurse anesthesia students. The control group was given a written case study which is considered a traditional method of content delivery. The treatment groups studied vignettes, which are short, realistic, simulated audio-visual videos that demonstrate content to be relayed. The research hypothesis studied the use of anesthesia crisis oriented vignettes as an educational tool to impact memory recall, thus potentially improving application to clinical practice. Hypotheses for the study were: Hypothesis 1 (Hl): Student anesthetists exposed to audio-visual vignettes will exhibit superior clinical performance during simulated apparatus-related crisis events, evidenced by higher group mean demonstration scores, when compared to a matched group exposed to written case studies. Hypothesis 2 (H2): Student anesthetists exposed to audio-visual vignettes will exhibit superior recall of apparatus related material, evidenced by higher group mean post-test scores, when compared to a matched group exposed to written case studies. Using the paired samples t-test and analysis of variance procedure (ANOVA), statistical findings were evaluated for significance. The different teaching methodologies were represented in the abbreviation of the variables studied. Two different crisis oriented events were presented in vignette format, a malfunctioning unidirectional expiratory valve and a malfunctioning suctioning apparatus. Variables that were studied include: clinical performance during the anesthesia machine checkout process by recreating the stuck expiratory valve and malfunctioning suction apparatus scenarios. Statistically, mixed results were obtained. The impact that the stuck expiratory valve vignette had on student recall and clinical performance was found to be insignificant. The impact resulting from exposure to the non-functioning suction apparatus vignette was found to be significant for both student recall and clinical performance. Other recall and clinical performance measures related to the non- functioning suction apparatus were also found to be significant. Conclusions: In this research study, memory and clinical performance were impacted when the anesthesia provider incorporated the correct anesthesia apparatus checkout process and crisis management skills into their practice. This research demonstrated that under the conditions of this study, teaching methodology impacted some areas of clinical performance. Due to the small sample size and because the clinical performance measurements tools were newly designed for this particular study, findings from this study cannot be generalized to any other group or population. However, the findings from this study merit further investigation into the potential use of vignettes as an educational methodology to impact clinical practice and improve patient safety.
机译:研究人员研究了在非教育环境中针对危机或情感事件的记忆回忆。但是,在医疗保健领域,对医疗保健教育中针对危机或情感事件的回忆概念的研究很少。据报道,诸如自然灾害,生物恐怖行为和工业事故等以危机为导向的事件会影响记忆。患者安全是麻醉教育的主要重点,适当的危机管理对高质量的麻醉护理至关重要。由于麻醉输送的关键性质,迫切需要不断开发能够增强,支持和改善当前影响患者安全的麻醉方法的方法。需要研究临床和教学讲师所使用的能提高教学效果的教育方法,以确保以与美国麻醉护士协会(AANAs)认可委员会一致的方式将患者安全内容提供给护士麻醉学生。 COA)护理标准。本研究利用模拟的麻醉危机情况,比较了护士麻醉学生在两种内容交付方法(书面案例研究和患者安全渐晕)之间在认知烙印和实践应用方面的差异。对照组接受了书面案例研究,这被认为是传统的内容交付方法。治疗小组研究了小插曲,这些小插曲是简短,真实,模拟的视听视频,演示了要中继的内容。该研究假设研究了将麻醉危机导向的渐晕片用作影响记忆记忆的教育工具,从而有可能改善在临床实践中的应用。该研究的假设是:假设1(Hl):暴露于视听晕影的学生麻醉师在与器械相关的模拟危机事件中将表现出优异的临床表现,与配对暴露于书面形式的配对组相比,其更高的组平均演示得分得到了证明。实例探究。假设2(H2):与暴露于书面案例研究的配对组相比,暴露于视听晕影的学生麻醉师对器械相关材料的召回率更高,这由较高的组平均测试后分数证明。使用配对的样本t检验和方差分析(ANOVA),评估统计结果的显着性。所研究变量的缩写表示了不同的教学方法。以小插图形式呈现了两种不同的危机导向事件,即单向呼气阀故障和吸气装置故障。研究的变量包括:麻醉机检出过程中的临床表现,包括重新产生卡住的呼气阀和抽吸装置故障的情况。统计上,获得了混合结果。发现呼气瓣膜小插图卡住对学生记忆和临床表现的影响微不足道。研究发现,暴露于无法正常工作的抽吸装置小插图对学生的回忆和临床表现均具有重大影响。还发现与无功能的抽吸装置有关的其他召回和临床性能指标也很重要。结论:在本研究中,当麻醉提供者将正确的麻醉设备检查程序和危机处理技能纳入其实践时,会影响记忆力和临床表现。这项研究表明,在这项研究的条件下,教学方法影响了某些领域的临床表现。由于样本量较小,并且由于临床性能测量工具是针对该特定研究而新设计的,因此该研究的结果无法推广到任何其他群体或人群。然而,这项研究的发现值得进一步探讨将小插图作为一种教育方法来影响临床实践并提高患者安全性的潜在用途。

著录项

  • 作者

    McLain Nina E.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2007
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号