首页> 外文OA文献 >Numerical Simulation of Unsteady Aerodynamics in Insect Flight using Generic Planform Shapes
【2h】

Numerical Simulation of Unsteady Aerodynamics in Insect Flight using Generic Planform Shapes

机译:通用平面形状在昆虫飞行中非定常空气动力学的数值模拟

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The aim of this work is to provide a better understanding of the aerodynamic performance of various planform shapes undergoing various kinematics for flapping wing flight. There have been extensive analyses and experiments of 2D airfoils undergoing flapping motion. These studies reveal various mechanisms for unsteady aerodynamic lift and thrust generation such as the importance of the control of leading edge vortices. However, 3D analysis of flapping wing flight with various planform shapes is required to study 3D flow structures and their role in determining the lift and thrust for the design of a future flapping wing micro air vehicle.Firstly, CFD analysis has been carried out on 5 rigid simple planform shapes (rectangle, reverse ellipse, ellipse, triangle and four ellipse) at a Reynolds number of 13500 to determine the effect of planform shape on the aerodynamic performance of a flapping wing undergoing hover kinematics. The kinematics is described in terms of only 2 angles, sweep and pitch. The performance is compared through the use of force histories, pressure distribution plots, flow structure images, power utilized and lift generated. It is found that the area distribution near the wing tip contributes to the difference in lift generation between the five planforms. The rectangular planform is found to have the best performance with a suitable balance of power consumed and lift generated as compared to the reverse ellipse which has the highest lift generation.Secondly, the kinematics from a honeybee and thrips are used on the same 5 planform shapes to determine the effect of kinematics on the performance of each planform. These kinematics are more realistic as the variations of all the 3 angles (sweep, pitch and elevation) are considered. It is found from the analysis that the reverse ellipse planform performs the best in terms of lift generation but the ellipse performs better overall when power economy (ratio of average vertical force generated to the average power consumed) is considered. In thrips kinematics, the reverse ellipse is again seen to perform the best in terms of the power economy. For a given planforms, there is a reduction in lift generation in thrips kinematics compared to the honeybee kinematics except in the case of the rectangle where there is an increase.These results have been explained in terms of the flow structures and associated pressure distributions generated on the wings.
机译:这项工作的目的是更好地理解各种平面形状的空气动力学性能,这些形状经历了用于襟翼飞行的各种运动学。已经对进行拍打运动的2D机翼进行了广泛的分析和实验。这些研究揭示了产生不稳定的空气动力升力和推力的各种机制,例如控制前缘涡旋的重要性。但是,为了研究3D流动结构及其在确定升力和推力方面的作用,需要对具有各种平面形状的襟翼飞行进行3D分析,以设计未来的襟翼微型飞行器。首先,对5进行了CFD分析雷诺数为13500的刚性简单平面形状(矩形,反椭圆形,椭圆形,三角形和四个椭圆形),以确定平面形状对经过悬停运动学的扑翼的气动性能的影响。仅用2个角度(扫掠和俯仰)描述了运动学。通过使用力历史,压力分布图,流动结构图像,利用的功率和产生的升力来比较性能。发现在翼尖附近的面积分布导致了五个平面之间升力产生的差异。与产生最大升力的反向椭圆形相比,发现矩形平面形状的性能最佳,功率消耗和产生的升力具有适当的平衡。其次,蜜蜂和蓟马的运动学用于相同的5种平面形状确定运动学对每种平台性能的影响。当考虑所有3个角度(倾斜,俯仰和仰角)的变化时,这些运动学更加现实。从分析中发现,就升力产生而言,反向椭圆形平台表现最佳,但考虑到功率经济性(所产生的平均垂直力与所消耗的平均功率之比),椭圆形的整体效果更好。在蓟马运动学中,就功率经济而言,反向椭圆再次表现出最佳性能。对于给定的平面形式,除蜜蜂运动学之外,蓟马运动学的提升产生量减少了,除了矩形的情况有所增加外,这些结果已根据流动结构和相关的压力分布进行了解释。翅膀。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号