首页> 外文OA文献 >The (Air) Power to Coerce: The Role of Air Power in Twenty-First Century Coercive Diplomacy
【2h】

The (Air) Power to Coerce: The Role of Air Power in Twenty-First Century Coercive Diplomacy

机译:强迫的(空中)力量:空中力量在二十一世纪强制性外交中的作用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Coercive diplomacy as a strategy seeks to prevent crises from escalating into conflict, by using a combination of diplomatic measures and the threat, or if necessary the limited application, of force to change a belligerent’s behaviour. This thesis examines the dynamics of coercive diplomacy and the role of air power as a key instrument of coercion.The international response to the Libyan crisis in 2011 is a contemporary case where air power was employed following unsuccessful diplomatic efforts and non-military methods of coercion. In this instance, the United Nations (UN) declared objective was for Libyan leader Colonel Muammar Gaddafi to end the violence against Libyan civilians, re-affirming his responsibility to protect the population, and subsequently authorising UN member states to protect civilians under threat of attack. When the violence continued, the leaders of the major contributing countries also sought to coerce Colonel Gaddafi to relinquish power.The strategy of coercive diplomacy was largely unsuccessful in the Libyan crisis primarily due to the disproportionate outcome sought—regime change. The combination of diplomacy, sanctions and military force did not result in Gaddafi changing his aggressive behaviour or capitulating, and the air campaign itself did not follow a ‘textbook’ case of coercive diplomacy, as force was applied at the high end of the coercive spectrum from the outset. Indeed, elements of the campaign comprised a limited war.Air power, however, was instrumental in meeting the UN mandate by protecting Libyan civilians from their own government forces. Its application in Libya has reinforced that while military force is likely to remain the coercive option of ‘last resort’, air power has become an attractive option of choice where non-military methods have failed. Air power can be activated quickly, it removes the requirement for a sustained commitment of ‘boots on the ground’, and it can be employed in a precise and discriminate manner.The conduct of the air campaign in Libya illustrated the importance of coalition operations and the risks of an over-reliance on the United States. Most significantly for Australia, it highlighted the challenges that might confront a small air force seeking to employ coercive air power in the future.
机译:强制性外交作为一项战略,旨在通过将外交措施与威胁或必要时有限地使用武力改变交战国的行为相结合来防止危机升级为冲突。本文考察了强制外交的动态以及空中力量作为强制性关键工具的作用.2011年国际对利比亚危机的反应是一个当代案例,在外交努力不成功和非军事手段进行强制之后,空中力量被采用。在这种情况下,联合国宣布的目标是让利比亚领导人穆阿迈尔·卡扎菲上校结束对利比亚平民的暴力,重申其保护人民的责任,随后授权联合国会员国在受到攻击威胁的情况下保护平民。当暴力持续下去时,主要贡献国的领导人也试图迫使卡扎菲上校放弃权力。在利比亚危机中,强制外交的策略在很大程度上是不成功的,这主要是由于寻求不成比例的结果-政权更迭。外交,制裁和军事力量的结合并没有导致卡扎菲改变其侵略行为或投降,而且空中行动本身也没有遵循强制性外交的“教科书”案,因为武力是在强制性范围的高端使用的从一开始。的确,这场运动的组成部分是一场有限的战争,但是空中力量通过保护利比亚平民免受其本国政府军的侵害,有助于实现联合国的使命。它在利比亚的应用进一步证明,虽然军事力量可能仍然是“最后手段”的强制选择,但在非军事方法失败的情况下,空中力量已成为有吸引力的选择。空中力量可以快速启动,它消除了对“地面上的靴子”持续承诺的要求,并且可以以精确和区分性的方式使用。利比亚的空中战役表明了联合行动和军事行动的重要性。过度依赖美国的风险。对于澳大利亚而言,最重要的是,它突显了一支小型空军可能在未来寻求使用强制性空中力量时所面临的挑战。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号