ududAberrations in the peripheral visual field have been implicated in the development of myopia. Investigators have concentrated on myopes and emmetropes. As significantly higher levels of aberrations have been found on-axis in hyperopes than myopes, this study investigated the differences in peripheral aberrations in hyperopic, emmetropic and myopic groups. ududududCycloplegic peripheral aberration for 5 mm pupils was measured at 39 locations across 42° x 32° of right eye fields with a COAS-HD Hartmann-Shack aberrometer in 9 hyperopes (mean age 29 ± 5 years, spherical equivalent refraction M +1.47 ± 0.58 D), 20 emmetropes (28 ± 7 years, +0.06 ± 0.36 D) and 20 myopes (27 ± 6 years, ‒2.55 ± 1.82 D). Relative peripheral refraction error RPRE and 3rd–4th order Zernike coefficients were determined and compared between the groups using repeated measures ANOVAs.ududududHyperopes and emmetropes had relative peripheral myopia across the visual field, with considerable nasal-temporal asymmetry for both groups and superior-inferior asymmetry for hyperopes. Myopes had minimal RPRE along the horizontal meridian, and less myopic RPRE along the vertical meridian than the other groups. There was little difference between groups in astigmatic components or higher-order Zernike coefficients, except for fourth-order spherical aberration C which was more positive in hyperopes than in both emmetropes (mean difference ± 95% CI = +0.048 ± 0.046 µm, p 0.030) and myopes (+0.067 ± 0.042 µm, p 0.003). Coma changed rapidly across the visual field with similar rates for all the groups. The rates for C along the horizontal meridian (mean rate ‒0.013 µm/degree), were significantly higher than for C along the vertical meridian (‒0.009 µm/degree). ududududHyperopes and emmetropes had greater relative peripheral myopia than the myopes. There were asymmetries in RPRE along the vertical meridian for hyperopes which was not present in the emmetropes, suggesting there may be asymmetries in peripheral eye length along the vertical meridian for the former. All higher-order aberrations were affected by field eccentricity, but refractive error affected only the spherical aberration coefficient which was more positive for hyperopes than for other groups. It is unlikely that high levels of aberration contribute to myopia development.
展开▼
机译:ud ud周边视野的像差与近视的发展有关。研究人员集中在近视眼和正视眼上。由于远视眼中轴上的像差水平明显高于近视眼,因此本研究调查了远视,正视和近视组的外周像差差异。 ud ud ud ud用9个远视眼的COAS-HD Hartmann-Shack像差仪在42°x 32°右眼视野的39个位置测量了5 mm瞳孔的眼球末梢像差(平均年龄29±5岁,球形等效屈光度M +1.47±0.58 D),20个正视眼(28±7年,+0.06±0.36 D)和20个近视眼(27±6年,‒2.55±1.82 D)。使用重复测量方差分析确定并比较两组的相对周边屈光误差RPRE和三阶至四阶Zernike系数。 ud ud ud ud屈光参差和正视眼在整个视野范围内具有相对的近视近视,对于两组和远视的上下左右不对称性。与其他组相比,近视眼在水平子午线上的RPRE最小,而在垂直子午线上的近视RPRE少。两组之间的散光分量或更高阶的Zernike系数差异不大,除了四阶球面像差C在远视眼中比在两个正视眼中更正(均值±95%CI = +0.048±0.046 µm,p 0.030) )和近视(+0.067±0.042 µm,p 0.003)。昏迷在整个视野中迅速变化,所有组的比率相似。沿水平子午线的C速率(平均速率‒0.013 µm /度)显着高于沿垂直子午线的C速率(‒0.009 µm /度)。 ud ud ud ud与近视者相比,超级视力者和正视者的相对周边近视度数更大。远视眼的垂直子午线在RPRE中存在不对称性,正视眼中没有远视眼,这表明前者在垂直子午线的眼周长度可能存在不对称性。所有高阶像差都受到场偏心率的影响,但屈光误差仅影响球面像差系数,远视比其他组的正像差更大。高水平的像差不太可能促进近视的发展。
展开▼