首页> 外文OA文献 >Experimental studies of lipped channel beams subject to web crippling under two-flange load cases
【2h】

Experimental studies of lipped channel beams subject to web crippling under two-flange load cases

机译:两法兰载荷作用下唇形腹板受腹板弯曲的试验研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Lipped channel beams (LCBs) are commonly used as flexural members such as floor joists and bearers in the constructionud6 industry. These thin-walled LCBs are subjected to specific buckling and failure modes, one of them being web crippling. Despite considerableud7 research in this area, some recent studies have shown that the current web crippling design rules are unable to predict the test capacities underud8 end-two-flange (ETF) and interior-two-flange (ITF) load conditions. In many instances, web crippling predictions by the available designud9 standards such as AISI S100, AS/NZS 4600 and Eurocode 3 Part 1-3 are inconsistent, i.e., unconservative in some cases, although theyud10 are conservative in other cases. Hence, experimental studies consisting of 36 tests were conducted in this research to assess the web cripplingud11 behavior and capacities of high-strength LCBs under two-flange load cases (ETF and ITF). Experimental results were then compared with theud12 predictions from current design rules. Comparison of the ultimate web crippling capacities from tests showed that the design equations areud13 very unconservative for LCB sections under the ETF load case and are conservative for the ITF load case. Hence, improved equations wereud14 proposed to determine the web crippling capacities of LCBs based on the experimental results from this study. Current design equations doud15 not provide the direct strength method (DSM) provisions for web crippling. Hence, suitable design rules were also developed under the DSMud16 format using the test results and buckling analyses using finite-element analyses.
机译:唇形通道梁(LCB)在建筑 ud6行业中通常用作挠曲构件,例如地板托梁和承重梁。这些薄壁LCB经受特定的屈曲和破坏模式,其中之一是腹板瘫痪。尽管在该领域进行了大量的研究,但最近的一些研究表明,当前的卷筒纸设计规则无法预测ud8端二法兰(ETF)和内二法兰(ITF)负载条件下的测试能力。在许多情况下,根据可用的设计标准ud9(例如AISI S100,AS / NZS 4600和Eurocode 3第1-3部分),Web崩溃的预测是不一致的,即在某些情况下是不保守的,尽管在某些情况下它们是保守的。因此,在这项研究中进行了由36个测试组成的实验研究,以评估两法兰负载情况(ETF和ITF)下高强度LCB的网状破坏 ud11行为和容量。然后将实验结果与当前设计规则的预测进行比较。从测试得出的最终卷筒纸压碎能力的比较表明,对于ETF负载情况下的LCB截面,设计方程非常不保守,对于ITF负载情况而言,设计方程非常保守。因此,根据这项研究的实验结果,提出了一种改进的方程式来确定LCB的纸幅弯曲能力。当前的设计方程式没有为纸幅的折断提供直接强度法(DSM)规定。因此,还使用测试结果和使用有限元分析的屈曲分析以DSM ud16格式开发了合适​​的设计规则。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号