首页> 外文OA文献 >DEM test, visagraph eye movement recordings, and reading ability in children
【2h】

DEM test, visagraph eye movement recordings, and reading ability in children

机译:DEM测试,Visograph眼动记录和儿童阅读能力

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Purpose. To determine how Developmental Eye Movement (DEM) test results relate to reading eye movement patterns recorded with the Visagraph in visually normal children, and whether DEM results and recorded eye movement patterns relate to standardized reading achievement scores. Methods. Fifty-nine school-age children (age = 9.7 ± 0.6 years) completed the DEM test and had eye movements recorded with the Visagraph III test while reading for comprehension. Monocular visual acuity in each eye and random dot stereoacuity were measured and standardized scores on independently administered reading comprehension tests [reading progress test (RPT)] were obtained. Results. Children with slower DEM horizontal and vertical adjusted times tended to have slower reading rates with the Visagraph (r = -0.547 and -0.414 respectively). Although a significant correlation was also found between the DEM ratio and Visagraph reading rate (r = -0.368), the strength of the relationship was less than that between DEM horizontal adjusted time and reading rate. DEM outcome scores were not significantly associated with RPT scores. When the relative contribution of reading ability (RPT) and DEM scores was accounted for in multivariate analysis, DEM outcomes were not significantly associated with Visagraph reading rate. RPT scores were associated with Visagraph outcomes of duration of fixations (r = -0.403) and calculated reading rate (r = 0.366) but not with DEM outcomes. Conclusions.DEM outcomes can identify children whose Visagraph recorded eye movement patterns show slow reading rates. However, when reading ability is accounted for, DEM outcomes are a poor predictor of reading rate. Visagraph outcomes of duration of fixation and reading rate relate to standardized reading achievement scores; however, DEM results do not. Copyright © 2011 American Academy of Optometry.
机译:目的。若要确定发育性眼动(DEM)测试结果与在视觉正常儿童中用Visagraph记录的阅读眼动模式之间的关系,以及DEM结果和记录的眼动模式是否与标准化的阅读成绩得分相关。方法。 59名学龄儿童(年龄= 9.7±0.6岁)完成了DEM测试,并在阅读理解时用Visagraph III测试记录了眼球运动。测量每只眼睛的单眼视力和随机点立体度,并获得独立进行阅读理解测试[阅读进度测试(RPT)]的标准化评分。结果。在水平和垂直方向上进行DEM调整的儿童,使用Visagraph的阅读率往往较低(分别为r = -0.547和-0.414)。尽管在DEM比率和Visagraph读取率之间也发现了显着的相关性(r = -0.368),但是这种关系的强度小于在水平方向调整时间和读取率之间的关系。 DEM结果分数与RPT分数没有显着相关。当在多元分析中考虑阅读能力(RPT)和DEM得分的相对贡献时,DEM结局与Visagraph阅读率没有显着相关。 RPT分数与固定持续时间的Visagraph结果(r = -0.403)和计算的阅读率(r = 0.366)相关,而与DEM结果无关。结论:DEM结果可以识别出Visagraph记录的眼动模式显示阅读速度慢的孩子。但是,考虑到阅读能力时,DEM结果不能很好地预测阅读率。固定时间和阅读率的Visagraph结果与标准化的阅读成绩得分有关;但是,DEM结果没有。版权所有©2011美国验光学院。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号