首页> 外文OA文献 >Gay, mostly gay, or bisexual leaning gay? An exploratory study distinguishing gay sexual orientations among young men.
【2h】

Gay, mostly gay, or bisexual leaning gay? An exploratory study distinguishing gay sexual orientations among young men.

机译:同性恋,主要是同性恋,还是双性恋同性恋?一项区分年轻男性同性恋性取向的探索性研究。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This exploratory study assessed physiological, behavioral, and self-report measures of sexual and romantic indicators of sexual orientation identities among young men (mean age = 21.9 years) with predominant same-sex sexual and romantic interests: those who described themselves as bisexual leaning gay (n = 11), mostly gay (n = 17), and gay (n = 47). Although they were not significantly distinguishable based on physiological (pupil dilation) responses to nude stimuli, on behavioral and self-report measures a descending linear trend toward the less preferred sex (female) was significant regarding sexual attraction, fantasy, genital contact, infatuation, romantic relationship, sex appeal, and gazing time to the porn stimuli. Results supported a continuum of sexuality with distinct subgroups only for the self-report measure of sexual attraction. The other behavioral and self-report measures followed the same trend but did not significantly differ between the bisexual leaning gay and mostly gay groups, likely the result of small sample size. Results suggest that romantic indicators are as good as sexual measures in assessing sexual orientation and that a succession of logically following groups from bisexual leaning gay, mostly gay, to gay. Whether these three groups are discrete or overlapping needs further research.
机译:这项探索性研究评估了主要具有同性性恋和浪漫兴趣的年轻男性(平均年龄= 21.9岁)的性取向和浪漫指标的性行为和浪漫指标的生理,行为和自我报告测量:那些自称是双性恋同性恋者的人(n = 11),主要是同性恋(n = 17)和同性恋(n = 47)。尽管根据生理(瞳孔扩张)对裸露刺激的反应,并没有明显的区别,但是根据行为和自我报告的测量,对于性吸引力,幻想,生殖器接触,痴情,恋爱关系,性吸引力以及对色情刺激的凝视时间。结果仅以自我报告的性吸引力为依据,支持了具有不同亚组的连续性行为。其他行为和自我报告的测量方法遵循相同的趋势,但双性恋倾向的同性恋者和大多数为同性恋者的群体之间没有显着差异,这很可能是样本量较小的结果。结果表明,浪漫指标在评估性取向方面和性指标一样好,而且从逻辑上来说,从双性恋倾向的同性恋者(主要是同性恋者)到同性恋者,其继承群体是连续的。这三个组是离散的还是重叠的,还需要进一步研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号