首页> 外文OA文献 >Network regulation and regulatory institutional reform : revisiting the case of Australia.
【2h】

Network regulation and regulatory institutional reform : revisiting the case of Australia.

机译:网络监管和监管体制改革:再审澳大利亚案例。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

It is well-understood that the success of liberalizing the electricity supply industry depends crucially on the quality and design of the regulatory and institutional framework. This paper analyses the regulatory arrangements that underpin the work of the Australian Energy Regulator (AER). These arrangements are contrasted with the regulatory structure of electricity provision in Norway. A key difference between the reform processes in the two countries relates to the lack of privatization in Norway and the coexistence of private and publicly owned generators and distributors in Australia. This comparative analysis allows us to make several recommendations to improve regulatory arrangements in Australia. These include greater independence for the AER, better coordination among regulatory institutions, greater use of benchmarking analysis, greater customer involvement, and improving market transparency and privatization of government-owned corporations. However, the success of privatization will hinge upon the effectiveness of the regulatory environment.
机译:众所周知,电力供应行业自由化的成功关键取决于监管和体制框架的质量和设计。本文分析了支持澳大利亚能源监管局(AER)工作的监管安排。这些安排与挪威电力供应的监管结构形成对比。两国改革进程之间的主要区别在于挪威缺乏私有化以及澳大利亚私有和公有的发电商和发行商并存。这项比较分析使我们能够提出一些建议,以改善澳大利亚的监管安排。这些措施包括提高AER的独立性,加强监管机构之间的协调,更多地使用基准分析,增加客户参与度以及改善市场透明度和国有企业的私有化。但是,私有化的成功将取决于监管环境的有效性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Nepal R.; Menezes F.; Jamasb T.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号