首页> 外文OA文献 >Measurement of biceps brachii muscle cross-sectional area by extended-field-of-view ultrasound imaging technique
【2h】

Measurement of biceps brachii muscle cross-sectional area by extended-field-of-view ultrasound imaging technique

机译:扩展视场超声成像技术测量肱二头肌肱肌横截面积

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study investigated the reliability of the extended-field-of-view (EFOV) ultrasonography technique and its validity against magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for biceps brachii muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) assessment, and applied the method to examine changes in CSA following 10 sets of 3 maximal eccentric contractions of the elbow flexors. Bicep brachii CSA was assessed using both EFOV and MRI techniques at the mid-point of the upper arm. A Pearson product moment analysis showed a high correlation (r = 0.99) between the EFOV and MRI measures; however, the CSA obtained from the EFOV (12.5 ± 6.3 cm² ) was smaller (P=0.004) than that of MRI (12.9 ± 6.1 cm²). The reliability of the EFOV technique was assessed using the same scan image tracing twice (between-traces) and two images scanned from the same site (between-scans), and using the images taken from the same site one hour apart (between-measures). An Intra-class correlation (ICC) analysis showed good reliability (R=1.0) for both between-traces and between-scans, and coefficient of variation (CV) was less than 0.1 %. The reliability was also high for the measurements taken one hour apart (R=0.99, CV=0.7 %). These results show that EFOV is a valid and reliable method to assess biceps brachii CSA, but EFOV could give a smaller (~1 %) CSA than MRI. However, brachial is CSA was difficult to assess in this method, because of the limitation of the scanning technique. Biceps brachii CSA was increased (Pu3c0.05) immediately (8.7 ± 5.8 %) and 4 days (7.7 ± 6.0 %) following eccentric exercise of the elbow flexors, illustrating muscle swelling.
机译:这项研究调查了扩展视野(EFOV)超声检查技术的可靠性及其对磁共振成像(MRI)在肱二头肌肱动脉横截面积(CSA)评估中的有效性,并应用该方法检查了CSA跟随肘部屈肌的10组3组最大偏心收缩。使用EFOV和MRI技术在上臂中点评估肱二头肌CSA。皮尔森乘积矩分析显示,EFOV和MRI度量之间具有高度相关性(r = 0.99);但是,从EFOV(12.5±6.3cm²)获得的CSA比MRI(12.9±6.1cm²)小(P = 0.004)。 EFOV技术的可靠性是通过使用两次扫描相同的扫描图像(两次扫描之间)和从同一站点扫描的两幅图像(两次扫描之间),以及使用从同一站点间隔一小时的图像进行评估(两次测量之间的) )。类内相关性(ICC)分析显示迹线之间和扫描之间的可靠性都很好(R = 1.0),并且变异系数(CV)小于0.1%。间隔一小时进行的测量的可靠性也很高(R = 0.99,CV = 0.7%)。这些结果表明,EFOV是评估肱二头肌CSA的有效且可靠的方法,但EFOV可以提供比MRI小的CSA(〜1%)。但是,由于扫描技术的局限性,很难用这种方法来评估肱肱CSA。肘部屈肌偏心运动后,肱二头肌的CSA立即升高(8.7±5.8%)(4±7.7±6.0%)(P u3c0.05),说明肌肉肿胀。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号