首页> 外文OA文献 >Central venous Access device SeCurement And Dressing Effectiveness (CASCADE) in paediatrics: protocol for pilot randomised controlled trials
【2h】

Central venous Access device SeCurement And Dressing Effectiveness (CASCADE) in paediatrics: protocol for pilot randomised controlled trials

机译:儿科中心静脉通路设备的安全性和换药有效性(CASCADE):先导随机对照试验的方案

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Introduction: Paediatric central venous access devices(CVADs) are associated with a 25% incidence offailure. Securement and dressing are strategies used toreduce failure and complication; however, innovativetechnologies have not been evaluated for theireffectiveness across device types. The primary aim ofthis research is to evaluate the feasibility of launching afull-scale randomised controlled efficacy trial acrossthree CVAD types regarding CVAD securement anddressing, using predefined feasibility criteria.Methods and analysis: Three feasibility randomised,controlled trials are to be undertaken at the RoyalChildren’s Hospital and the Lady Cilento Children’sHospital, Brisbane, Australia. CVAD securement anddressing interventions under examination comparecurrent practice with sutureless securement devices,integrated securement dressings and tissue adhesive. Intotal, 328 paediatric patients requiring a peripherallyinserted central catheter (n=100); non-tunnelled CVAD(n=180) and tunnelled CVAD (n=48) to be inserted will berecruited and randomly allocated to CVAD securementand dressing products. Primary outcomes will be studyfeasibility measured by eligibility, recruitment, retention,attrition, missing data, parent/staff satisfaction and effectsize. CVAD failure and complication (catheter-associatedbloodstream infection, local infection, venousthrombosis, occlusion, dislodgement and breakage) willbe compared between groups.Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval to conductthe research has been obtained. All dissemination will beundertaken using the CONSORT Statementrecommendations. Additionally, the results will be sent tothe relevant organisations which lead CVAD focusedclinical practice guidelines development.
机译:简介:儿科中央静脉通路设备(CVAD)与25%的发病率相关。固定和包扎是减少失败和并发症的策略;但是,尚未针对各种设备类型对创新技术的有效性进行评估。本研究的主要目的是使用预先确定的可行性标准,评估针对CVAD固定和修饰的三种类型的CVAD开展全面随机对照疗效试验的可行性。方法和分析:皇家儿童医院将进行三项可行性随机对照试验。澳大利亚布里斯班的西伦托夫人儿童医院。接受检查的CVAD固定和矫正干预措施将目前的做法与无缝合固定装置,集成固定敷料和组织粘合剂进行了比较。总共328名需要外围插入中心导管的小儿患者(n = 100);将招募要插入的非隧道式CVAD(n = 180)和隧道式CVAD(n = 48),并随机分配给CVAD固定和敷料产品。主要结果将是通过资格,招聘,保留,减员,数据丢失,父母/员工满意度和影响程度来衡量研究可行性。比较两组之间的CVAD失败和并发症(导管相关的血流感染,局部感染,静脉血栓形成,闭塞,移位和破裂)。伦理和传播:已获得进行该研究的伦理认可。所有传播将使用CONSORT声明建议进行。此外,结果将发送给领导CVAD重点临床实践指南制定的相关组织。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号