首页> 外文OA文献 >Density fractions versus size separates: does physical fractionation isolate functional soil compartments?
【2h】

Density fractions versus size separates: does physical fractionation isolate functional soil compartments?

机译:密度分数与大小的关系是分开的:物理分馏是否能隔离功能性的土壤隔室?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Physical fractionation is a widely used methodology to study soil organic matter (SOM) dynamics, but concerns have been raised that the available fractionation methods do not well describe functional SOM pools. In this study we explore whether physical fractionation techniques isolate soil compartments in a meaningful and functionally relevant way for the investigation of litter-derived nitrogen dynamics at the decadal timescale. We do so by performing aggregate density fractionation (ADF) and particle size-density fractionation (PSDF) on mineral soil samples from two European beech forests a decade after application of N-15 labelled litter. Both density and size-based fractionation methods suggested that litter-derived nitrogen became increasingly associated with the mineral phase as decomposition progressed, within aggregates and onto mineral surfaces. However, scientists investigating specific aspects of litter-derived nitrogen dynamics are pointed towards ADF when adsorption and aggregation processes are of interest, whereas PSDF is the superior tool to research the fate of particulate organic matter (POM). Some methodological caveats were observed mainly for the PSDF procedure, the most important one being that fine fractions isolated after sonication can not be linked to any defined decomposition pathway or protective mechanism. This also implies that historical assumptions about the "adsorbed" state of carbon associated with fine fractions need to be re-evaluated. Finally, this work demonstrates that establishing a comprehensive picture of whole soil OM dynamics requires a combination of both methodologies and we offer a suggestion for an efficient combination of the density and size-based approaches.
机译:物理分级分离法是研究土壤有机质(SOM)动力学的一种广泛使用的方法,但是人们担心可用的分级分离法不能很好地描述功能性SOM库。在这项研究中,我们探讨了物理分级分离技术是否以有意义且在功能上相关的方式隔离了土壤隔间,以研究年代际尺度上凋落物衍生的氮动力学。我们通过在应用N-15标记的垃圾十年后,对来自两个欧洲山毛榉森林的矿物土壤样品进行聚集密度分级(ADF)和粒度密度分级(PSDF)来实现此目的。基于密度和尺寸的分馏方法均表明,随着分解的进行,从垫料中产生的氮与矿物质相之间的联系越来越紧密,聚集体中以及矿物表面上。然而,当对吸附和聚集过程感兴趣时,研究凋落物氮动力学特定方面的科学家将注意力转向ADF,而PSDF是研究颗粒有机物(POM)命运的绝佳工具。在PSDF程序中主要观察到一些方法上的告诫,最重要的是超声处理后分离出的细小部分不能与任何确定的分解途径或保护机制联系在一起。这也意味着需要重新评估与细小颗粒相关的碳的“吸附”状态的历史假设。最后,这项工作表明,要建立一个完整的全土壤OM动态图,需要将两种方法结合起来,并且我们建议对密度和基于尺寸的方法进行有效组合。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号