首页> 外文OA文献 >Does folk dancing make Hungarians? Táncház , folk dance as mother tongue, and folk national cultivation
【2h】

Does folk dancing make Hungarians? Táncház , folk dance as mother tongue, and folk national cultivation

机译:民间舞蹈会使匈牙利人吗? 坦查兹 ,民间舞蹈作为母语和民间民族修养

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper, based on participant research amongst folk revivalists, interviews with cultural managers, and extensive archival research, discusses the táncház (dance house) folk revival movement as the actualization of interwar efforts of “folk national cultivation” in Hungary. By putting the dance house in relationship with interwar folk critiques, the paper illustrates both continuities and discontinuities between them, most notably in conceptualizations of the relationship between the ethical or political roles of such critiques and of the folk itself. The paper argues that folk critiques, now and then, can play an important role in state formation by reproducing the folk and acting to secure its citizenship. Nevertheless, how the folk is defined is historically determined, as is the kind of citizenship entailed. Since folk national cultivation is premised on the idea that Hungarianness is produced through engagement with the folk and its traditions, the historical approach of this paper problematizes this process.
机译:本文基于民间复兴主义者之间的参与者研究,与文化管理者的访谈以及广泛的档案研究,讨论了táncház(舞蹈之家)民间复兴运动,作为匈牙利在“民间民族耕种”的战间努力的实现。通过将舞厅与两次世界大战之间的民间批评联系起来,本文说明了两者之间的连续性和不连续性,特别是在对这种批评的伦理或政治角色与民间自身之间的关系进行概念化的说明中。该论文认为,民间批判有时会通过繁殖民间并为确保其公民身份而在国家形成中发挥重要作用。然而,如何定义人的定义是历史决定的,公民身份的定义也是如此。由于民间民族耕种的前提是匈牙利人是通过与民间及其传统的接触而产生的,因此本文的历史方法对这一过程提出了质疑。

著录项

  • 作者

    Taylor Mary;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2008
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 hu
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号