首页> 外文OA文献 >What sways people's judgement of sleep quality? A quantitative choice-making study with good and poor sleepers
【2h】

What sways people's judgement of sleep quality? A quantitative choice-making study with good and poor sleepers

机译:是什么改变了人们对睡眠质量的判断?卧床好坏的定量选择研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Study objectives:udWe conceptualized sleep quality judgment as a decision-making process and examined the relative importance of 17 parameters of sleep quality using a choice-based conjoint analysis.ududMethods:udOne hundred participants (50 good sleepers; 50 poor sleepers) were asked to choose between 2 written scenarios to answer 1 of 2 questions: “Which describes a better (or worse) night of sleep?”. Each scenario described a self-reported experience of sleep, stringing together 17 possible determinants of sleep quality that occur at different times of the day (day before, pre-sleep, during sleep, upon waking, day after). Each participant answered 48 questions. Logistic regression models were fit to their choice data.ududResults:udEleven of the 17 sleep quality parameters had a significant impact on the participants’ choices. The top 3 determinants of sleep quality were: Total sleep time, feeling refreshed (upon waking), and mood (day after). Sleep quality judgments were most influenced by factors that occur during sleep, followed by feelings and activities upon waking and the day after. There was a significant interaction between wake after sleep onset and feeling refreshed (upon waking) and between feeling refreshed (upon waking) and question type (better or worse night of sleep). Type of sleeper (good vs poor sleepers) did not significantly influence the judgments.ududConclusions:udSleep quality judgments appear to be determined by not only what happened during sleep, but also what happened after the sleep period. Interventions that improve mood and functioning during the day may inadvertently also improve people’s self-reported evaluation of sleep quality.
机译:研究目标: ud我们将睡眠质量判断概念化为决策过程,并使用基于选择的联合分析研究了睡眠质量17个参数的相对重要性。 ud ud方法: ud一百名参与者(50名睡眠良好的人; 50名睡眠不良的人)睡眠者)被要求在2个书面情景中进行选择,以回答2个问题中的1个:“哪个描述了一个更好(或更糟)的睡眠夜晚?”。每种情况都描述了自我报告的睡眠经历,将一天中不同时间(前一天,入睡前,睡眠期间,醒来后,第二天)发生的17种可能的睡眠质量决定因素汇总在一起。每个参与者回答了48个问题。 Logistic回归模型适合他们的选择数据。 ud ud结果: ud17个睡眠质量参数中的11个对参与者的选择有重大影响。睡眠质量的三大决定因素是:总睡眠时间,感觉是否清爽(醒来时)和情绪(第二天)。睡眠质量判断受睡眠期间发生的因素影响最大,其次是醒来时和第二天的感觉和活动。入睡后醒来与感觉得到恢复(醒来时)之间以及醒来(醒来时)与问题类型(更好或更晚的睡眠时间)之间存在显着的相互作用。睡眠者的类型(睡眠者对睡眠者的好坏)并没有显着影响判断。 ud ud结论: ud睡眠质量判断似乎不仅取决于睡眠期间发生的情况,还取决于睡眠时间之后的情况。白天改善情绪和功能的干预措施可能也会无意中提高人们对睡眠质量的自我报告评价。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号