首页> 外文OA文献 >The Role of Student Attitude towards Peer Review in Anonymous Electronic Peer Review in an EFL Writing Classroom
【2h】

The Role of Student Attitude towards Peer Review in Anonymous Electronic Peer Review in an EFL Writing Classroom

机译:EFL写作课堂中学生对同行评审的态度在匿名电子同行评审中的作用

摘要

Over the past 30 years, there has been little consensus on the benefits of peer review (PR) with respect to the teaching of expository writing in English to non-native speakers. Lu & Bol (2007) reported on several ESL writing instruction studies (Chaudron, 1983; Mangelsdorf, 1992; Paulus, 1999) that suggested peer feedback was as good as, and in some cases better than teacher feedback in helping revise and improve students' papers (p. 101). Brammer & Rees (2007), however, reported, "We frequently hear students complain bitterly that peer review is a waste of time or blame their peers for `not catching all the mistakes' and students do not stay on task during the peer review process" (p. 71). The literature also identifies social issues that can negatively affect the outcome of face-to-face PR, such as students being easily biased or not honest when providing feedback due to friendship, gender, race, interpersonal relationships, or personal preferences (Carson & Nelson, 1996; Ghorpade & Lackritz, 2001; MacLeod, 1999; Nilson, 2003; Zhao, 1998). To maximize the benefits of PR and reduce social interferences, this study incorporated anonymous electronic-peer review with 25 EFL students enrolled in an expository writing class in Spain. The goal of this dissertation is to explore the relationship between students' attitudes towards peer review and one) the amount and type of corrections a student makes to an essay in anonymous electronic-peer review, and two) the amount and type of corrections a student incorporates into his/her original essay after receiving feedback from a peer. The participants completed several Likert questionnaires, participated in PR training, wrote two drafts of an essay and were interviewed. The interviews provided data not only on the corrections mentioned above, but also how the participants viewed the experience, the effects PR had on their writing, insecurities about their English writing skills, and confidence they had in themselves and their peers based on perceived target language competence. Findings include discussion on perceptions and implications of electronic peer review on EFL learners' ability to provide helpful feedback and the willingness of the students to participate in peer review again in the future.
机译:在过去的30年中,就同行评审(PR)的好处向非母语人士进行英语讲稿写作的教学方面,几乎没有共识。 Lu&Bol(2007)报道了几项ESL写作指导研究(Chaudron,1983; Mangelsdorf,1992; Paulus,1999),这表明同伴反馈在帮助修订和改善学生的学习能力方面既好又好于老师反馈。论文(第101页)。 Brammer&Rees(2007)报道说:“我们经常听到学生们苦苦抱怨同行评审浪费时间,或者责怪他们的同行没有抓住所有的错误,并且在同行评审过程中学生没有专心做事。 ”(第71页)。文献还指出了可能对面对面PR产生负面影响的社会问题,例如学生由于友情,性别,种族,人际关系或个人喜好而在提供反馈时容易产生偏见或不诚实(Carson&Nelson ,1996; Ghorpade&Lackritz,2001; MacLeod,1999; Nilson,2003; Zhao,1998)。为了最大程度地提高PR的收益并减少社会干扰,本研究纳入了匿名电子同行评审,其中25名EFL学生在西班牙参加了说明文写作班。本论文的目的是探讨学生对同review审查的态度与以下两者之间的关系:一)学生对匿名电子同行评语中一篇论文的更正的数量和类型;二)学生对同peer的纠正的数量和类型。在收到同行的反馈后,将其纳入他/她的原始论文中。参与者完成了几次李克特问卷,参加了PR培训,撰写了两篇论文草稿并接受了采访。访谈不仅提供了有关上述更正的数据,还提供了参与者如何看待体验,公关对他们的写作产生的影响,对英语写作技巧的不安全感以及基于感知目标语言对自己和同伴的信心的数据。权限。研究结果包括讨论电子同行评议对EFL学习者提供有用反馈的能力以及学生将来再次参加同行评议的意愿的看法和影响。

著录项

  • 作者

    Cote Robert Arthur;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en_US
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号