首页> 外文OA文献 >Differences in speech processing among elderly hearing-impaired listeners with or without hearing aid experience: Eye-tracking and fMRI measurements
【2h】

Differences in speech processing among elderly hearing-impaired listeners with or without hearing aid experience: Eye-tracking and fMRI measurements

机译:有或没有助听经验的老年人听力受损听众的语音处理差异:眼动和功能磁共振成像测量

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In contrast to the effects of hearing loss, the effects of hearing aid (HA) experience on speech-in-noise (SIN) processing are underexplored. Using an eye-tracking paradigm that allows determining how fast a participant can grasp the meaning of a sentence presented in noise together with two pictures that correctly or incorrectly depict the sentence meaning (the ‘processing time’), Habicht . (2016, 2017) found that inexperienced HA (iHA) users were slower than experienced HA (eHA) users, despite no differences in speech recognition. To examine the influence of HA use on SIN processing further, the eye-tracking paradigm was adapted for functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) measurements. Groups of eHA ( = 13) and iHA ( = 14) users matched in terms of age, hearing loss and working memory capacity participated. As before, despite no difference in speech recognition, the iHA group had longer processing times than the eHA group. Furthermore, the iHA group showed more brain activation for SIN relative to noise-only stimuli in left precentral gyrus, cerebellum anterior lobe, superior temporal gyrus and right medial frontal gyrus compared to the eHA group. Together, these results support the idea that HA experience positively influences the ability to process SIN quickly and that it reduces the recruitment of brain regions outside the core speech-comprehension network.
机译:与听力损失的影响相反,未充分研究助听器(HA)经验对噪声语音(SIN)处理的影响。使用眼动追踪范式,可以确定参与者能够以多快的速度掌握杂音中出现的句子的含义,以及正确或错误地描述句子含义的两张图片(“处理时间”),Habicht。 (2016,2017)发现,尽管语音识别没有差异,但经验不足的HA(iHA)用户比经验丰富的HA(eHA)用户要慢。为了进一步检查HA对SIN处理的影响,将眼动追踪范式用于功能磁共振成像(fMRI)测量。参加了年龄,听力损失和工作记忆能力匹配的eHA(= 13)和iHA(= 14)用户组。和以前一样,尽管语音识别没有差异,但iHA组的处理时间比eHA组长。此外,与eHA组相比,iHA组相对于左前中央回,小脑前叶,颞上回和右额中回的纯噪声刺激显示出更多的SIN脑激活。总之,这些结果支持以下想法:医管局的经验会积极影响快速处理SIN的能力,并会减少核心语音理解网络之外的大脑区域的募集。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号