首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Neuroscience >Exploring Differences in Speech Processing Among Older Hearing-Impaired Listeners With or Without Hearing Aid Experience: Eye-Tracking and fMRI Measurements
【2h】

Exploring Differences in Speech Processing Among Older Hearing-Impaired Listeners With or Without Hearing Aid Experience: Eye-Tracking and fMRI Measurements

机译:探索有或没有助听器经验的老年听障听众在语音处理方面的差异:眼动和fMRI测量

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Recently, evidence has been accumulating that untreated hearing loss can lead to neurophysiological changes that affect speech processing abilities in noise. To shed more light on how aiding may impact these effects, this study explored the influence of hearing aid (HA) experience on the cognitive processes underlying speech comprehension. Eye-tracking and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) measurements were carried out with acoustic sentence-in-noise (SiN) stimuli complemented by pairs of pictures that either correctly (target picture) or incorrectly (competitor picture) depicted the sentence meanings. For the eye-tracking measurements, the time taken by the participants to start fixating the target picture (the ‘processing time’) was measured. For the fMRI measurements, brain activation inferred from blood-oxygen-level dependent responses following sentence comprehension was measured. A noise-only condition was also included. Groups of older hearing-impaired individuals matched in terms of age, hearing loss, and working memory capacity with (eHA; N = 13) or without (iHA; N = 14) HA experience participated. All acoustic stimuli were presented via earphones with individual linear amplification to ensure audibility. Consistent with previous findings, the iHA group had significantly longer (poorer) processing times than the eHA group, despite no differences in speech recognition performance. Concerning the fMRI measurements, there were indications of less brain activation in some right frontal areas for SiN relative to noise-only stimuli in the eHA group compared to the iHA group. Together, these results suggest that HA experience leads to faster speech-in-noise processing, possibly related to less recruitment of brain regions outside the core sentence-comprehension network. Follow-up research is needed to substantiate the findings related to changes in cortical speech processing with HA use.
机译:最近,越来越多的证据表明,未经治疗的听力损失会导致神经生理学变化,从而影响噪声中语音的处理能力。为了更清楚地说明援助可能如何影响这些效果,本研究探讨了助听器(HA)经验对语音理解基础认知过程的影响。眼动和功能磁共振成像(fMRI)测量是通过噪声对句子(SiN)进行刺激,辅之以正确地(目标图片)或错误地(竞争对手图片)描述句子含义的图片对。对于眼动追踪测量,测量了参与者开始固定目标图像所花费的时间(“处理时间”)。对于功能磁共振成像测量,从句子理解后的血氧水平依赖性反应中推断了大脑的激活。还包括纯噪声条件。参加过(eHA; N = 13)或没有(iHA; N = 14)HA经历的年龄,听力受损个体的年龄,听力损失和工作记忆能力匹配的组。所有的声音刺激都通过带有单独线性放大功能的耳机呈现,以确保可听性。与以前的研究结果一致,尽管语音识别性能没有差异,但iHA组的处理时间(较差)比eHA组长得多。关于fMRI测量,与iHA组相比,有迹象表明,与eHA组的纯噪声刺激相比,SiN的一些右额叶区域的大脑活动较少。总之,这些结果表明,HA经验可以加快语音中的有声语音处理,这可能与核心句子理解网络外部的大脑区域招募更少有关。需要进行后续研究以证实与使用HA引起的皮层语音处理变化有关的发现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号