首页> 外文OA文献 >Barring 'inappropriate people'? The operation of a barring list of social care workers:an analysis of the first referrals to the Protection of Vulnerable Adults list
【2h】

Barring 'inappropriate people'? The operation of a barring list of social care workers:an analysis of the first referrals to the Protection of Vulnerable Adults list

机译:禁止“不适当的人”?禁止社会护理工作者名单的运作:对首次提交保护弱势成年人名单的分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Since July 2004, employers of social care staff working with vulnerable adults in England and Wales have been required to refer workers dismissed for misconduct that harmed vulnerable adults or placed them at risk of harm, to the Protection of Vulnerable Adults (POVA) list. Employers are also required to check the list before employing people to work with vulnerable adults. The Department of Health commissioned the authors to analyse the first 100 referrals to the POVA list. Key findings include the over-representation of males and care home staff in the sample of referrals, compared with national figures on care figures and the tendency for male staff to be involved in more physical types of misconduct. These findings are discussed in the light of the literature on workforce regulation and suggestions are made for the implementation of the Bichard Inquiry recommendations. While it is argued that the list is a positive development, it is also stressed that more general measures to improve the quality of services may be at least as important a means of protecting vulnerable adults. Furthermore, the article argues for public debate on the proper balance between the rights of staff and the protection of vulnerable people
机译:自2004年7月以来,要求在英格兰和威尔士与弱势成人工作的社会护理人员雇主将因行为不当而受到伤害而被解雇的工人,这些行为伤害了弱势成人或使他们有受到伤害的风险,被列入弱势成人保护(POVA)名单。雇主还必须在雇用人员与弱势成年人一起工作之前核对清单。卫生部委托作者对POVA列表中的前100个转诊进行分析。主要调查结果包括在转诊样本中男性和养老院工作人员的比例过高,与国家护理数据相比,以及男性工作人员参与更多不当行为的趋势。这些发现是根据有关劳动力法规的文献进行讨论的,并提出了有关实施Bichard查询建议的建议。尽管有人认为该清单是一个积极的发展,但也有人强调,提高服务质量的更一般性措施至少可能是保护弱势成年人的重要手段。此外,文章主张就工作人员权利与保护弱势群体之间的适当平衡进行公开辩论

著录项

  • 作者

    Stevens, M; Manthorpe, J;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2007
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号