首页> 外文OA文献 >The Concept of Preventive Actions Securing the Enforcement of Tax Liability to be Determined in the Future: Prosperity under the Principle of Prevention in Tax Law
【2h】

The Concept of Preventive Actions Securing the Enforcement of Tax Liability to be Determined in the Future: Prosperity under the Principle of Prevention in Tax Law

机译:未来确定的确保税收责任执行的预防措施概念:税法预防原则下的繁荣

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The article analyses preventive measures employed by tax authorities to secure payment of taxes. The development in this field reflects general trends in public law, which now is aimed at prevention of threat (in this case, the loss of tax revenue in consequence of taxpayer acts) instead of fighting the consequences of it. The author compares summary assessment models regulated in the United States Internal Revenue Code to the model provided in the Estonian Taxation Act. Since this is the only tax-related fundamental right regulated expressis verbis by the European Convention on Human Rights (Protocol 1, Article 1), some cases heard by the European Court of Human Rights are discussed in addition. The author proposes certain standards that could be followed in the design of such preventive measures, following the minimum standards outlined by said court and some best-practice ideas arising from the comparison between Estonian and US regulations.
机译:本文分析了税务机关为确保纳税而采取的预防措施。该领域的发展反映了公法的总体趋势,该趋势现在旨在防止威胁(在这种情况下,是由于纳税人行为而导致的税收损失),而不是与之抗争。作者将《美国国内税收法》规定的汇总评估模型与《爱沙尼亚税收法》所规定的模型进行了比较。由于这是《欧洲人权公约》(议定书1,第1条)所规定的唯一与税收有关的基本权利监管的表达方式,因此,还将讨论欧洲人权法院审理的一些案件。作者提出了在设计这种预防措施时可以遵循的某些标准,这要遵循上述法院概述的最低标准以及通过将爱沙尼亚法规与美国法规进行比较而得出的一些最佳实践想法。

著录项

  • 作者

    Künnapas Kaido;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号