首页> 外文OA文献 >Beyond GDP and Back: what is the value-added by additional components of welfare measurement?
【2h】

Beyond GDP and Back: what is the value-added by additional components of welfare measurement?

机译:除了GDP和GDP:福利衡量的其他要素带来的附加值是多少?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

"Recently, building on the highly polarizing Stiglitz report, a growing literature suggests that statistical offices and applied researchers explore other aspects of human welfare apart from material well-being, such as job security, crime, health, environmental factors and subjective perceptions. To explore the additional information of these indicators, we analyze data on the macro level from the German Federal Statistical Office combined with micro level data from the German SOEP (1991-2008) on the personal work situation and subjective feelings concerning several aspects of life. Employing the indicators suggested by the Stiglitz Report, we find that much of the variation in many well-being measures can indeed be captured well by the hard economic indicators as used in the literature, especially by GDP and the unemployment rate. This suggests that the hard indicators are still a reasonable and quite robust gauge of well-being of a country. And yet, we also see that these correlations are far from perfect, thus giving considerable hope that there is room for a broader statistical reporting." (author's abstract)
机译:“最近,在极富两极分化的斯蒂格里茨报告的基础上,越来越多的文献表明,统计局和应用研究人员除了物质福祉外,还探索了人类福利的其他方面,例如工作安全,犯罪,健康,环境因素和主观观念。探索这些指标的其他信息,我们分析德国联邦统计局的宏观数据,以及德国SOEP(1991-2008)的微观数据,这些数据涉及个人生活状况和有关生活各个方面的主观感受。根据《斯蒂格利茨报告》建议的指标,我们发现,许多福利措施中的许多差异确实可以通过文献中使用的严格的经济指标(尤其是GDP和失业率)得到很好的把握。指标仍然是衡量一个国家福祉的合理且相当有力的指标,但是,我们也看到这些相关性ns还远远不够完美,因此给人们很大的希望,就是有空间进行更广泛的统计报告。” (作者的摘要)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号