首页> 外文OA文献 >A mechanistic multi-centre, parallel group, randomised placebo controlled trial of Mesalazine for treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhoea (IBS-D)
【2h】

A mechanistic multi-centre, parallel group, randomised placebo controlled trial of Mesalazine for treatment of irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhoea (IBS-D)

机译:美沙拉嗪的多中心平行平行机制随机安慰剂对照试验,用于治疗腹泻型肠易激综合征(IBS-D)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Introduction: Immune activation has been reported in the mucosa of irritable bowel syndrome patients with diarrhoea (IBS-D) and some small studies have suggested that Mesalazine may reduce symptoms. We performed a double blind, randomised placebo controlled trial of 2g Mesalazine twice daily versus placebo for 3 months in Rome III criteria IBS-D patients. Primary outcome was daily average stool frequency during weeks 11-12; secondary outcomes were abdominal pain, stool consistency, urgency and satisfactory relief of IBS symptoms.udMethods: Participants were randomised after a 2-week baseline stool diary. All participants completed a 12-week stool diary and at the end of each week recorded the presence of “satisfactory relief of IBS symptoms”. udResults: 136 patients with IBS-D (82 F, 54 M) were randomised, 10 patients withdrew from each group. Analysis by intention to treat showed the daily average stool frequency during weeks 11 and 12 were mean (SD), 2.8 (1.2) in Mesalazine and 2.7 (1.9) in placebo group with no significant group difference (95% confidence interval) 0.1 (-0.33,0.53); p=0.66. Mesalazine did not improve abdominal pain, stool consistency nor percentage with satisfactory relief compared to placebo during the last 2 weeks follow up. udConclusion: This study does not support any clinically meaningful benefit or harm of Mesalazine compared with placebo in unselected IBS with diarrhoea. More precise subtyping based on underlying disease mechanisms is needed to allow more effective targeting of treatment in IBS. (ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT01316718)
机译:简介:据报道,肠易激惹腹泻患者(IBS-D)的粘膜具有免疫激活作用,一些小型研究表明,美沙拉嗪可以减轻症状。在罗马III级IBS-D患者中,我们进行了每日两次两次2g美沙拉嗪与安慰剂的双盲,随机安慰剂对照试验,为期3个月。主要结局是第11至12周的每日平均大便次数;次要结果是腹痛,粪便稠度,尿急和IBS症状缓解令人满意。 ud方法:参与者在2周基线大便日记后随机分组。所有参与者完成了为期12周的大便日记,并在每个周末结束时记录了“ IBS症状令人满意的缓解”的情况。结果:136例IBS-D患者(82 F,54 M)被随机分组​​,每组退出10例。治疗意向分析显示,第11周和第12周的每日平均大便次数为平均值(SD),美沙拉嗪为2.8(1.2),安慰剂组为2.7(1.9),两组之间无显着性差异(95%置信区间)0.1(- 0.33,0.53); p = 0.66。在最近2周的随访中,与安慰剂相比,美沙拉嗪不能改善腹痛,大便稠度或百分率,令人满意的缓解效果。 ud结论:在未选择的腹泻型IBS中,与安慰剂相比,本研究不支持美沙拉嗪与安慰剂相比具有任何临床意义上的有益或害处。需要基于潜在疾病机制的更精确的亚型分析,才能更有效地针对IBS治疗。 (ClinicalTrials.gov编号NCT01316718)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号