首页> 外文OA文献 >Efficacy and Safety of Mirabegron Add-on Therapy to Solifenacin in Incontinent Overactive Bladder Patients with an Inadequate Response to Initial 4-Week Solifenacin Monotherapy:A Randomised, Double-blind, Multicentre, Phase 3b Study (BESIDE)
【2h】

Efficacy and Safety of Mirabegron Add-on Therapy to Solifenacin in Incontinent Overactive Bladder Patients with an Inadequate Response to Initial 4-Week Solifenacin Monotherapy:A Randomised, Double-blind, Multicentre, Phase 3b Study (BESIDE)

机译:对于开始4周Solifenacin单药治疗反应不佳的失禁性膀胱过度活动症患者,Mirabegron联合Solifenacin疗法的疗效和安全性:一项随机,双盲,多中心,3b期研究(BESIDE)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: Incontinence has a greater detrimental effect on quality of life than other symptoms of overactive bladder (OAB) and is often difficult to treat with antimuscarinic mono therapy.Objective: To evaluate efficacy, safety/tolerability of combination (solifenacin5 mg/mirabegron 50 mg) vs solifenacin 5 or 10 mg in OAB patients remaining incontinent after 4-wk solifenacin 5 mg.Design, Setting, and Participants: OAB patients remaining incontinent despitedaily solifenacin 5 mg during 4-wk single-blind run-in, were randomised 1:1:1 to double-blind daily combination, solifenacin 5 or 10 mg for 12 wk. Patients receiving combination were initiated on mirabegron 25 mg increasing to 50 mg after week 4.Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis: Primary endpoint: change from baseline to end of treatment (EOT) in mean number of incontinence episodes/24 (stratified rank ANCOVA). Key secondary endpoints: change from baseline to EOT in mean number of micturitions/24 h (ANCOVA) and number of incontinence episodes during 3-d diary at EOT (mixed effects Poisson regression). BESIDE tested the superiority of combination vs solifenacin 5 mg, noninferiority (and potential superiority) of combination vs solifenacin 10 mg (key secondary endpoints), and safety/tolerability of combination vs Solifenacin monotherapy.Results and Limitations: 2174 patients were randomised: combination (n=727), solifenacin 5mg (n=728) or 10 mg (n=719). At EOT, combination was superior to solifenacin 5 mg, with significant improvements in daily incontinence (p=0.001), daily micturitions (p0.001) and incontinence during 3-d diary (p=0.014). Combination was noninferior to BESIDE Primary Final resubmission draft January 2016 4 solifenacin 10 mg for key secondary endpoints, and superior vs solifenacin 10 mg for improving daily micturitions. All treatments were well tolerated.Conclusions: Adding mirabegron 50 mg to solifenacin 5 mg further improved OAB symptoms vs solifenacin 5 or 10 mg, and was well tolerated in OAB patients remaining incontinent after initial solifenacin 5 mg
机译:背景:与其他膀胱过度活动症(OAB)症状相比,尿失禁对生活质量的危害更大,并且通常难以通过抗毒蕈碱单药治疗。目的:评估联合用药的有效性,安全性/耐受性(索非那新5 mg /米拉贝隆50 mg )vs Solifenacin 5或10 mg在4周solifenacin 5 mg后仍失禁的OAB患者中。设计,设置和参加者:尽管在4 wk单盲磨合期间每天使用solifenacin 5 mg,但OAB患者仍失禁,随机分为1:每天以1:1的剂量双盲服用,索非那新5或10毫克,连续12周。接受联合治疗的患者开始接受米拉贝隆25 mg的治疗,并在第4周后增加至50 mg。结果测量和统计分析:主要终点:从基线到治疗结束(EOT)的平均失禁发作次数/ 24(分层ANCOVA)。主要的次要终点:EOT的3d日记中从基线到EOT的平均排尿次数/ 24 h(ANCOVA)和失禁发作次数的变化(混合效应泊松回归)。 BESIDE测试了联合用药相对于索非那新5 mg的优越性,联合用药相对于索非那新10 mg的非劣效性(和潜在优势)(关键的次要终点)以及联合用药相对于Solifenacin单药的安全性/耐受性。结果与限制:2174例患者被随机分为:联合用药( n = 727),索非那新5mg(n = 728)或10 mg(n = 719)。在EOT时,联合用药优于5 mg索非那新,在3d日记中每日尿失禁(p = 0.001),每日排尿量(p <0.001)和尿失禁有明显改善(p = 0.014)。联合用药不次于BESIDE初次最终提交草稿(2016年1月)4索利那新10 mg用于次要关键终点,优于索非那新10 mg用于改善每日排尿。结论:结论:与索非那新5或10 mg相比,将米拉贝隆50 mg加至索非那新5 mg进一步改善了OAB的症状,并且在最初索非那新5 mg后仍失禁的OAB患者中耐受性良好

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号