首页> 外文OA文献 >Measurement of shoulder joint strength and mobility in common collegiate aged overhead athletes
【2h】

Measurement of shoulder joint strength and mobility in common collegiate aged overhead athletes

机译:普通高校普通架空运动员的肩关节力量和活动度的测量

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Introduction: Previous research has stereotyped many overhead athletes as baseball pitchers. Due to the different physiological stresses in each overhead sport, it may not be appropriate to group all overhead athletes together. The objective of this study was to show sport specific physical adaptations in common overhead sports. Methods: Forty-three healthy, male athletes participated in this cross-sectional study; fifteen baseball pitchers, fifteen volleyball athletes, thirteen tennis athletes and fifteen control athletes. Internal rotation (IR) and external rotation (ER) shoulder range of motion (ROM), glenohumeral internal rotation deficit (GIRD), external rotation gain (ERG), posterior shoulder tightness (PST) (supine and side-lying methods), shoulder strength and scapular kinematics were assessed in a neuromuscular research laboratory. ROM was assessed with a goniometer while PST was assessed with a goniometer (supine) and carpenters' square (side-lying). Strength was assessed with an isokinetic dynamometer and scapular kinematics with an electromagnetic tracking device. Results: Pitchers had more dominant IR ROM than tennis athletes and less dominant IR ROM than control athletes. Tennis athletes had the lowest IR ROM of all groups included in this study. Volleyball athletes had less dominant IR ROM than control athletes. Pitchers and tennis athletes had more GIRD than control athletes had. Pitchers and tennis athletes had higher between limb differences with the supine method of assessing PST. With the supine assessment, tennis athletes had increased dominant PST compared to control athletes; additionally, all overhead athletes had decreased non-dominant PST. At 90° and 120° humeral elevation, pitchers had the most scapular elevation, volleyball athletes had more elevation than tennis athletes did, and tennis athletes had less elevation than control athletes did. There were no differences in external rotation ROM, total rotation ROM, or strength measures. Conclusion: Not all overhead athletes had the same physical characteristics. The differences between sports in each of the variables could be due to the different amount of physiologic stress on the shoulder in each sport. These results may help to show healthy, sport specific adaptations in each sport. Clinicians should develop sport specific rehabilitation protocols and return to play criteria for athletes to return to play earlier and stronger.
机译:简介:先前的研究将许多高架运动员定型为棒球投手。由于每种高架运动的生理压力不同,将所有高架运动员分组在一起可能是不合适的。这项研究的目的是显示常见的架空运动中特定于运动的身体适应性。方法:43名健康的男性运动员参加了这项横断面研究。十五名棒球投手,十五名排球运动员,十三名网球运动员和十五名控制运动员。内旋(IR)和外旋(ER)肩部运动范围(ROM),盂肱内旋赤字(GIRD),外旋增益(ERG),后肩松紧度(PST)(仰卧和侧卧方法),肩力量和肩cap运动学在神经肌肉研究实验室进行了评估。 ROM用测角计评估,而PST用测角计(仰卧)和木匠的直角(侧卧)评估。用等速测功机和带有电磁跟踪装置的肩cap运动学评估强度。结果:投手的IR ROM比网球运动员要强,而IR ROM则比对照运动员要少。在这项研究中,所有组中网球运动员的IR ROM最低。排球运动员的IR ROM少于对照组的运动员。投手和网球运动员的GIRD高于对照运动员。俯仰法评估PST时,投手和网球运动员的肢体差异较高。通过仰卧评估,与对照运动员相比,网球运动员的主要PST增加了。另外,所有高架运动员的非主要PST均降低。在肱骨仰角为90°和120°时,投手的肩高程最高,排球运动员的仰角比网​​球运动员的仰角高,网球运动员的仰角比对照组的运动员低。外部旋转ROM,总旋转ROM或强度度量没有差异。结论:并非所有高架运动员都具有相同的身体特征。每个变量中的运动之间的差异可能是由于每种运动中肩部的生理压力不同。这些结果可能有助于显示每种运动的健康,针对运动的适应性。临床医生应制定针对运动的康复协议,并制定重返比赛标准,以使运动员早日康复并变得更强壮。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ricci Robert Daniel;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2006
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号