首页> 外文OA文献 >Life Cycle Assessment of Diesel and Electric Public Transportation Buses
【2h】

Life Cycle Assessment of Diesel and Electric Public Transportation Buses

机译:柴油和电动公交车的生命周期评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In 2005, there were approximately 50,000 diesel powered public transit buses operating in the United States, consuming over 500 million gallons of fuel annually. The Clean Air Act identifies diesel powered motor vehicles, including transit buses, as significant sources of several criteria pollutants which contribute to ground level ozone formation or smog. The effects of air pollution in urban areas are often more significant due to congestion and can lead to respiratory and cardiovascular health impacts. Life cycle assessment has been utilized in the literature to compare conventional gasoline powered passenger cars with various types of electric and hybrid powered alternatives; however, no similarly detailed studies exist for mass transit buses. LCA results from this study indicate that the use phase, consisting of diesel production/combustion for the conventional bus and electricity generation for the electric bus, dominates most impact categories; however, the effects of battery production are significant for global warming, carcinogenics, ozone depletion, and ecotoxicity. There is a clear connection between the mix of power generation technologies and the preference for the diesel or electric bus. With the existing U.S. average grid, there is a strong preference for the conventional diesel bus over the electric bus when considering global warming impacts alone. Policy makers must consider regional variations in the electricity grid prior to recommending the use of battery electric buses to reduce CO2 emissions. This study found that the electric bus was preferable in only eight states including Washington and Oregon. Improvements in battery technology reduce the life cycle impacts from the electric bus, but the electricity grid makeup is the dominant variable.
机译:2005年,美国大约有50,000辆柴油动力公交车在运营,每年消耗超过5亿加仑的燃料。 《清洁空气法》将包括公交车在内的柴油动力汽车确定为几种标准污染物的重要来源,这些污染物会造成地面臭氧的形成或烟雾。由于交通拥堵,城市地区的空气污染影响通常更为严重,并且可能导致呼吸道和心血管健康受到影响。文献已经利用生命周期评估来比较传统的汽油动力乘用车与各种类型的电动和混合动力替代品。但是,目前尚无类似的公交巴士详细研究。这项研究的LCA结果表明,使用阶段包括大多数传统类别的柴油生产/燃烧和电动公共汽车的发电,这主要是影响类别。然而,电池生产对全球变暖,致癌物,臭氧消耗和生态毒性具有重大影响。发电技术的混合与对柴油或电动公交车的偏好之间存在明确的联系。在仅考虑全球变暖影响的情况下,利用现有的美国平均电网,相对于电动公交车,传统柴油公交车更受青睐。政策制定者在建议使用电池电动巴士以减少CO2排放之前,必须考虑电网的区域差异。这项研究发现,只有在华盛顿州和俄勒冈州这八个州,电动公交车才是首选。电池技术的改进减少了电动公交车的生命周期影响,但是电网组成是主要变量。

著录项

  • 作者

    Cooney Gregory Allen;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号