首页> 外文OA文献 >Evaluation and Analysis of Environmentally Sustainable Methodologies for Extraction of Betulin from Birch Bark with Focus on Industrial Feasibility
【2h】

Evaluation and Analysis of Environmentally Sustainable Methodologies for Extraction of Betulin from Birch Bark with Focus on Industrial Feasibility

机译:以工业可行性为重点的白桦树皮提取桦木素的环境可持续方法学评价与分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Betulin from birch bark was extracted using two principally different extraction methodologies - classical Reflux Boiling (RB) and Pressurized Liquid Extraction (PLE). The extraction methods were analyzed based on both recovery and purity as well as for RB industrial feasibility. The purity and recovery for the different extraction methods were analyzed using High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) coupled with three different detection principles: Diode Array Detection (DAD), Mass Spectrometry (MS) and Charged Aerosol Detection (CAD). The chromatographic purity was determined by all detections whereas the DAD was used also for complementary gravimetric calculations of the purity of the extracts. The MS detection (in MS and MS/MS modes) was mainly used to characterize the impurities. Two steps to increase the purity of RB extracts were evaluated - pre-boiling the bark in water and precipitation by adding water to the extract. Finally, the methods were compared in terms of amounts of betulin produced and solvent consumed. The RB method including a precipitation step produced the highest purity of betulin. However, results indicate that PLE using three cycles with the precipitation step gives similar purities as for RB. The PLE method produced up to 1.6 times higher amount of extract compared to the RB method. However, the solvent consumption (liter solvent per gram product) for PLE was around 4.5 times higher as compared to the classical RB. PLE performed with only one extraction cycle gave results more similar to RB with 1.2 times higher yield and 1.4 times higher solvent consumption. The RB process was investigated on an industrial scale using a model approach and several important key-factors could be identified. The most energy demanding step was the recycling of extraction solvent which motivates that solvent consumption should be kept low and calculations show a great putative energy reduction by decreasing the ethanol concentration used in the RB process to lower than 90%.
机译:使用两种主要不同的提取方法从桦树皮提取桦木素-经典回流沸腾(RB)和加压液体提取(PLE)。基于回收率和纯度以及RB工业可行性对提取方法进行了分析。使用高效液相色谱(HPLC)结合三种不同的检测原理对不同提取方法的纯度和回收率进行了分析:二极管阵列检测(DAD),质谱(MS)和带电气溶胶检测(CAD)。色谱纯度通过所有检测确定,而DAD也用于提取物纯度的补充重量分析。 MS检测(在MS和MS / MS模式下)主要用于表征杂质。评估了提高RB提取物纯度的两个步骤-将树皮预先在水中煮沸,然后通过向提取物中添加水进行沉淀。最后,根据所产生的甜菜碱量和溶剂消耗量对方法进行了比较。包括沉淀步骤的RB方法可产生最高纯度的betulin。但是,结果表明,在沉淀步骤中使用三个循环的PLE具有与RB相似的纯度。与RB方法相比,PLE方法产生的提取物量最多高1.6倍。但是,PLE的溶剂消耗量(每克产品公升溶剂)比传统RB高约4.5倍。仅用一个萃取周期进行的PLE给出的结果与RB相似,收率高1.2倍,溶剂消耗高1.4倍。使用模型方法以工业规模对RB过程进行了研究,并且可以确定几个重要的关键因素。耗能最大的步骤是萃取溶剂的循环利用,这促使应保持较低的溶剂消耗量,并且通过将RB工艺中使用的乙醇浓度降低至90%以下,计算结果显示出了很大的推定能耗。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号