首页> 外文OA文献 >A Comparison of the Predictive Capabilities of Several Turbulence Models using Upwind and Central-Difference Computer Codes
【2h】

A Comparison of the Predictive Capabilities of Several Turbulence Models using Upwind and Central-Difference Computer Codes

机译:使用上风和中差计算机代码比较几种湍流模型的预测能力

摘要

Four turbulence models are described and evaluated for transonic flows using the upwind code CFL3D and the central-difference code TLNS3D. In particular, the effects of recent modifications to the half-equation model of Johnson-King are explored in detail, and different versions of the model are compared. This model can obtain good results for both two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) separated flows. The one-equation models of Baldwin-Barth and Spalart-Allmaras perform well for separated airfoil flows, but can predict the shock too far forward at the outboard stations of a separated wing. The equilibrium model of Baldwin-Lomax predicts the shock location too far aft for both 2D and 3D separated flows, as expected. In general, all models perform well for attached or mildly separated flows.
机译:描述了四个湍流模型,并使用上风代码CFL3D和中心差分代码TLNS3D评估了跨音速流。特别是,详细探讨了对Johnson-King半方程模型最近修改的影响,并比较了该模型的不同版本。对于二维(2D)和三维(3D)分离流,该模型都可以获得良好的结果。 Baldwin-Barth和Spalart-Allmaras的单方程模型在分离的机翼流中表现良好,但可以预测在分离的机翼外侧位置的震动过大。 Baldwin-Lomax的平衡模型预测,如预期的那样,对于2D和3D分离流,冲击位置都位于船尾偏远的位置。通常,所有模型对于附着的或轻度分离的流都表现良好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号