首页> 外文OA文献 >Shock Characteristics Measured Upstream of Both a Forward-Swept and an Aft-Swept Fan
【2h】

Shock Characteristics Measured Upstream of Both a Forward-Swept and an Aft-Swept Fan

机译:前掠风扇和后掠风扇上游测得的冲击特性

摘要

Three different types of diagnostic data-blade surface flow visualization, shroud unsteady pressure, and laser Doppler velocimeter (LDV)--were obtained on two fans, one forward-swept and one aft-swept, in order to learn more about the shocks which propagate upstream of these rotors when they are operated at transonic tip speeds. Flow visualization data are presented for the forward-swept fan operating at 13831 rpm(sub c), and for the aft-swept fan operating at 12500 and 13831 rpm(sub c) (corresponding to tip rotational Mach numbers of 1.07 and 1.19, respectively). The flow visualization data identify where the shocks occur on the suction side of the rotor blades. These data show that at the takeoff speed, 13831 rpm(sub c), the shocks occurring in the tip region of the forward-swept fan are further downstream in the blade passage than with the aft-swept fan. Shroud unsteady pressure measurements were acquired using a linear array of 15 equally-spaced pressure transducers extending from two tip axial chords upstream to 0.8 tip axial chords downstream of the static position of the tip leading edge of each rotor. Such data are presented for each fan operating at one subsonic and five transonic tip speeds. The unsteady pressure data show relatively strong detached shocks propagating upstream of the aft-swept rotor at the three lowest transonic tip speeds, and weak, oblique pressure disturbances attached to the tip of the aft-swept fan at the two highest transonic tip speeds. The unsteady pressure measurements made with the forward-swept fan do not show strong shocks propagating upstream of that rotor at any of the tested speeds. A comparison of the forward-swept and aft-swept shroud unsteady pressure measurements indicates that at any given transonic speed the pressure disturbance just upstream of the tip of the forward-swept fan is much weaker than that of the aft-swept fan. The LDV data suggest that at 12500 and 13831 rpm(sub c), the forward-swept fan swallowed the passage shocks occurring in the tip region of the blades, whereas the aft-swept fan did not. Due to this difference, the flows just upstream of the two fans were found to be quite different at both of these transonic speeds. Nevertheless, despite distinct differences just upstream of the two rotors, the two fan flows were much more alike about one axial blade chord further upstream. As a result, the LDV data suggest that it is unwise to attempt to determine the effect that the shocks have on far field noise by focusing only on measurements (or CFD predictions) made very near the rotor. Instead, these data suggest that it is important to track the shocks throughout the inlet.
机译:为了了解有关冲击波的更多信息,在两个风扇上获得了三种不同类型的诊断数据:叶片表面流可视化,导流罩不稳定压力和激光多普勒测速仪(LDV)。当它们以跨音速叶尖速度运行时,会在这些转子的上游传播。流量可视化数据是针对以13831 rpm(sub c)运行的前掠风扇和以12500和13831 rpm(sub c)运行的后掠风扇提供的(分别对应于1.07和1.19的叶尖旋转马赫数) )。流动可视化数据可确定在转子叶片的吸入侧发生冲击的位置。这些数据表明,在起飞速度13831 rpm(sub c)下,与后掠风扇相比,在前掠风扇的尖端区域产生的冲击在叶片通道的下游。使用15个等距压力传感器的线性阵列获取导流罩非定常压力测量值,该传感器从每个转子尖端前端静态位置的上游两个尖端轴向弦延伸到下游0.8个尖端轴向弦。对于以一个亚音速和五个跨音速叶尖速度运行的每个风扇,都提供了此类数据。非定常压力数据显示,在三个最低跨音速尖端速度下,在后掠转子上游传播的相对较强的分离冲击,以及在两个最高跨音速尖端速度下,附着在后掠风扇尖端的微弱,倾斜的压力扰动。用前掠风扇进行的非稳态压力测量未显示任何测试速度下在转子上游传播的强烈冲击。对前掠式和后掠式护罩非稳态压力测量结果的比较表明,在任何给定的跨音速下,前掠式风扇尖端上游的压力扰动都比后掠式风扇的弱得多。 LDV数据表明,在12500和13831 rpm(sub c)下,前掠风扇吞噬了叶片尖端区域中发生的通道冲击,而后掠风扇则没有。由于这种差异,发现在这两个跨音速速度下,两个风扇上游的流量都大不相同。尽管如此,尽管在两个转子的上游存在明显的差异,但两个风扇流在上游的一个轴向叶片弦上却更相似。结果,LDV数据表明,仅关注转子附近的测量(或CFD预测),试图确定冲击对远场噪声的影响是不明智的。取而代之的是,这些数据表明跟踪整个入口的冲击非常重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号