首页> 外文OA文献 >Essays on family investments, education policy and returns in China.
【2h】

Essays on family investments, education policy and returns in China.

机译:关于中国家庭投资,教育政策和回报的论文。

摘要

This thesis conducts an empirical analysis which explores the impact of parental investment, birth control policy and higher education expansion reform on individuals’ education attainments and labour market outcomes in China. The thesis includes three substantive chapters.ududFirstly, Chapter 3 presents new evidence on the child quantity-quality (Q-Q) trade-off in China. The primary contribution is the use of a new instrumental variable (IV) for fertility, i.e., local policy relaxation regarding Chinese birth control, in order to establish the causal effect of family size on child educational attainments and health outcomes. The aim is to examine whether having more children in a family has a negative impact on child quality and if the higher education of parents and a larger household income have a positive impact on child outcomes. Additionally, this estimation can check the effectiveness of the one-child policy. The findings indicate that there is a negative effect of fertility on education outcome, and support the prediction made by the Becker and Lewis’ model regarding the Q-Q trade-off for children. However, there is no evidence for health outcome.ududSecondly, Chapter 4 studies the role of higher education expansion policy in increasing the equality of higher education opportunities. In 1999, government rapidly expanded the number of higher education places available. The goal of this chapter is to explore the impact of family background and gender on access to higher education, prior to and following the higher education expansion policy. The analysis is based on nationally representative data from the Chinese Family Panel Studies (CFPS), collected in 2010. Cohort-level analysis and a difference-in-difference model were used to estimate how the benefits of the education expansion were distributed. The results show that higher education expansion has not been equally distributed among people from richer and poorer backgrounds. The education of parents remains a strong determinant of educational outcomes among children following education reform. Despite the benefits brought on by the expansion system, such as more opportunities for accessing tertiary education, these benefits have not been distributed evenly among families, geographies or gender. The equality of higher education opportunities remains a difficult task.ududFinally, Chapter 5 examines the causal impact of higher education expansion policy on labour market outcomes for young college graduates. Large pooled cross-sectional datasets were used from the Chinese Household Income Project (CHIP) between 1995 and 2013. First, the Mincer-style of returns to education for young cohorts were estimated in the 1995, 2002, 2007 and 2013 survey years. The aim was to compare the extent of returns to education among the pre-expansion cohort and the post-expansion cohort, and evidence is found a significant decrease in the returns to higher education of young cohorts. Second, another approach quantifies the effects of educational expansion on labour market outcomes and identifies the distribution of returns to education by exploring a natural experiment. This study exploited variation in the intensity of expansion in college numbers across provinces and applied a difference-in-difference model to estimate the effect of the education reform. The results of the study also illustrate expansion has a negative effect on college graduates’ returns and labour market outcomes.
机译:本文进行了实证分析,探讨了父母投资,节育政策和高等教育扩张改革对中国个人的教育水平和劳动力市场成果的影响。本文共分为三个实质性章节。 ud ud首先,第3章提供了有关中国儿童数量质量(Q-Q)权衡的新证据。主要的贡献是使用了一个新的工具变量(IV)来提高生育能力,即放宽了有关中国生育控制的地方政策,以便确定家庭规模对儿童受教育程度和健康结果的因果关系。目的是研究在一个家庭中生育更多的孩子是否对孩子的素质产生负面影响,以及父母的高等教育程度和家庭收入的增加是否对孩子的成绩产生积极影响。此外,此估计可以检查独生子女政策的有效性。研究结果表明,生育率对教育成果有负面影响,并支持贝克尔和刘易斯模型关于儿童Q-Q权衡的预测。但是,尚无健康结果的证据。 ud ud第二,第4章研究了高等教育扩张政策在增加高等教育机会平等方面的作用。在1999年,政府迅速增加了可用的高等教育名额。本章的目的是探讨在高等教育扩展政策之前和之后,家庭背景和性别对获得高等教育的影响。该分析是基于2010年中国家庭面板研究(CFPS)在全国范围内具有代表性的数据进行的。队列分析和差异模型用于估算教育扩展收益的分配方式。结果表明,高等教育的扩展在富人和穷人之间的分配不均。父母的教育仍然是教育改革后儿童教育成果的重要决定因素。尽管扩展系统带来了好处,例如有更多机会获得高等教育,但这些好处并未在家庭,地域或性别之间平均分配。高等教育机会均等仍然是一项艰巨的任务。 ud ud最后,第5章研究了高等教育扩展政策对年轻大学毕业生劳动力市场成果的因果影响。 1995年至2013年间,中国家庭收入项目(CHIP)使用了较大的合并横截面数据集。首先,在1995、2002、2007和2013年的调查年度中,对年轻人群的教育收益进行了Mincer式估计。目的是比较扩展前队列和扩展后队列之间的教育收益程度,并发现证据表明年轻队列的高等教育收益显着下降。其次,另一种方法量化了教育扩张对劳动力市场成果的影响,并通过探索自然实验来确定教育收益的分布。这项研究利用了各省大学数量增长强度的差异,并应用了差异模型来估计教育改革的效果。研究结果还表明,扩张对大学毕业生的报酬和劳动力市场成果产生负面影响。

著录项

  • 作者

    Wang Jin;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2017
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号