首页> 外文OA文献 >Crack of a helicopter main rotor actuator attachment: failure analysis and lessons learned
【2h】

Crack of a helicopter main rotor actuator attachment: failure analysis and lessons learned

机译:直升机主旋翼执行器附件的裂纹:故障分析和经验教训

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A Light Utility Helicopter (LUH), in the course of a training flight, leaving the ground during thetaxi to take off, went into an uncontrolled rolling to the right; consequently the helicopter gradually laid downon the right side. The impact with the runway destroyed the rotating blades up to the hubs rotor. The accidentinvestigation focused on main rotor oscillatory plate servo actuators . These components, directly linked to thecloche movements, regulate main rotor blades plane tilt and pitch. Following the preliminary examination, onlyfront servo actuator attachment was found to be broken in two parts. In detail, the present paper deals with thefracture analysis results. The servo actuator attachment material is a 2014 Aluminum alloy extrudate, undergoneto T651 heat treatment. Fracture surfaces were examined by optical and electronic microscopy in order todetermine the main morphological features and consequently to trace the origin of failure mechanism andcauses. The accordance with the specification requirements about alloy composition was verified by quantitativeelementary analysis through inductive coupled plasma spectroscopy (ICP); furthermore, semi-quantitativeelementary analysis was locally verified by Energy dispersion spectroscopy X ray (EDS_RX). Finally, thehydrogen content of the material was evaluated by the total hydrogen analysis. Microstructural andtechnological alloy characteristics were verified as well by using metallographic microscopy and hardness testingof the material.Macroscopic fracture surfaces evidences were characterized by the lack of any significant plastic deformationsand by the presence of symmetry compared to the servo actuator axis. Microscopic fracture features of both theinvestigated surfaces were not coherent to the hypothesis of an impact of the main rotor to the soil. Furtherachieved evidences, such as grain boundary fracture propagation, the presence of corrosion products, were all inaccordance with a Stress Corrosion Cracking (SCC) progressive fracture mechanism.Finite Element Analysis (FEA) located the highest tensile stress value, when the servo actuator is in its nominalworking condition, at the same points where the corrosion products were more concentrated (i.e. in the part ofthe fracture exposed to oxidative air effect for the longest time). The good agreement between FEA andmorphological evidences allowed to determine the progressive fracture origin area, though it was not possible toindividuate the crack initiation point. In fact, in correspondence to the initiation area of both the fracturesurfaces, shining and flat morphology was found;. then there were evidence of plastic deformations, due to thedetachment of a servo actuator part.The ICP analysis and hardness testing results were in accordance with the material specification requirements.However, the hydrogen content was one order of magnitude greater than the required value and many andunexpected globular formations were observed on the fracture surface. Part of these were dendritic formations,while the others looked smooth and shining. Further, FESEM boundary grain observation gave evidences of ahigh presence of precipitates on the investigated surfaces. Hence, observed microstructural characteristics,boundary grain precipitates and globular formations allowed to hypothesize possible overheating/eutecticmelting phenomena, occurred during manufacturing processes.As widely reported in literature, the AA 2014 alloy is one of the aluminum-copper-magnesium-silicon type,employing copper aluminide (CuAl2 ) as the primary precipitation-hardening agent. The need for a maximumCu phase dispersion in solid solution requires a heat treatment range with an upper limit (507°C) that is near tothe melting of the eutectics (510°C). Moreover, since the 1960s, AA2014 has been defined as sensitive to SCC.This condition is mainly related to the presence of coarse-grained and aligned CuAl2 precipitates. Thisarrangement is due to an overheating (more than 507°C) or to a cooling process carried out too slowly.Microstructural analysis was carried out on three items: 1) a large portion of the broken actuator attachment; 2)on a servoactuator coming from the same production batch; 3) on a servo actuator coming from a differentproduction batch.The microstructure from the broken actuator attachment showed a great amount of precipitates (secondphases) lengthwise aligned to the boundary grain, pores, and also cavities and dendritic globular formations.Analysis results, morphology evidences and reference images available on scientific literature were found to bein excellent agreement and validated the embrittlement and subsequent SCC mechanism hypotesis(intergranular failure propagation).In conclusion, flight accident causes are attributable to main rotor actuator attachment failure.Failure mechanism is classifiable as SCC supported by microstructural anomalies of the material. Theinvestigation of the manufacturing process highlighted how one of the servo actuator batches was not properlyproduced due to poor control and accuracy of heat treatment temperature and/or cooling time. This led tohydrogen embrittlement and to a microstructural problem (globular formations and boundary grainprecipitates). The combination of those phenomena caused an increase of the SCC sensitivity and were thebasic progressive failure driving forces.Nevertheless, as above mentioned, alloy composition was found compliant with the material specificationrequirements and this just because none of the scheduled quality control tests is able to determine the peculiarmicrostructural anomalies reported.
机译:在训练飞行过程中,一架轻型实用直升机(LUH)在滑行滑行时离开地面,向右无控制地滚动;因此,直升机逐渐放下右侧。跑道的冲击破坏了旋转的叶片,直至轮毂转子。事故调查集中在主转子振动板伺服执行器上。这些与齿轮运动直接相关的组件调节主旋翼叶片的平面倾斜度和俯仰角。经过初步检查,发现前部伺服执行器附件被分成两部分。详细地,本文处理了断裂分析结果。伺服执行器附件材料是2014铝合金挤压成型件,经过T651热处理。通过光学和电子显微镜检查断裂表面,以确定主要的形态特征,从而追踪破坏机理和原因。通过电感耦合等离子体光谱法(ICP)进行定量元素分析,验证了符合合金成分规格要求。此外,半定量元素分析已通过能量色散谱X射线(EDS_RX)进行了局部验证。最后,通过总氢分析评估材料的氢含量。通过金相显微镜和材料的硬度测试,也验证了合金的微观结构和技术特性。宏观断裂表面的特征是与伺服驱动器轴相比,没有明显的塑性变形,并且存在对称性。两个研究表面的微观断裂特征均与主旋翼对土壤的影响这一假设不一致。进一步的证据,例如晶界裂纹扩展,腐蚀产物的存在,都与应力腐蚀裂纹(SCC)渐进断裂机理不符。它的名义工作条件是在腐蚀产物更加集中的同一点(即在裂缝中暴露于氧化空气作用的时间最长的部分)。 FEA和形态学证据之间的良好一致性可以确定渐进的裂缝起源区域,尽管无法确定裂缝的起始点。实际上,对应于两个断裂面的起始区域,都发现了光亮和平坦的形态。然后由于伺服致动器部件的分离而出现塑性变形的证据.ICP分析和硬度测试结果符合材料规格要求,但是氢含量比要求值大一个数量级,并且在骨折表面观察到意外的球状形成。其中一部分是树突状结构,而其他则看起来光滑而有光泽。此外,FESEM边界晶粒观察提供了在研究表面上大量存在沉淀物的证据。因此,在制造过程中会观察到微观结构特征,边界晶粒沉淀和球状结构,以推测可能的过热/共晶熔化现象。正如文献中广泛报道的那样,AA 2014合金是一种铝-铜-镁-硅类型的合金,采用铝化铜(CuAl2)作为主要的沉淀硬化剂。在固溶体中需要最大的Cu相分散需要一个热处理范围,该范围的上限(507°C)接近共晶的熔点(510°C)。此外,自1960年代以来,AA2014被定义为对SCC敏感,这种情况主要与粗晶粒和排列的CuAl2沉淀物的存在有关。这种布置是由于过热(高于507°C)或冷却过程进行得太慢所致。对以下三个方面进行了微结构分析:1)大部分损坏的执行器附件; 2)在同一生产批次的伺服执行器上; 3)在来自不同生产批次的伺服执行器上。执行器破裂后的微观结构显示出大量的沉淀物(第二相)在长度方向上与边界晶粒,孔,空洞和树枝状球状排列对齐。分析结果,形态学证据与科学文献上的参考图像被发现具有很好的一致性,并验证了脆化和随后的SCC机制假设(晶间破坏传播)。导致飞行事故的原因可归因于主旋翼执行器的安装故障。故障机制可归类为材料微观结构异常所支持的SCC。制造过程的研究突显了由于不良的热处理温度和/或冷却时间控制和准确性,如何无法正确生产一批伺服执行器。这导致氢脆并引起微观结构问题(球状结构和边界晶粒沉淀)。这些现象的结合导致了SCC敏感性的提高,并且是基本的渐进破坏驱动力。尽管如此,如上所述,发现合金成分符合材料规格要求,这仅仅是因为预定的质量控制测试都无法确定报告了特殊的微结构异常。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号