首页> 外文OA文献 >Einfluss der präoperativen Schultersteife auf das Ergebnis der arthroskopischen subacromialen Dekompression
【2h】

Einfluss der präoperativen Schultersteife auf das Ergebnis der arthroskopischen subacromialen Dekompression

机译:术前肩部僵硬对关节镜下肩峰减压的影响

摘要

Stiffness of the shoulder can either occur as a primary or as a secondary form. Secondary shoulder stiffness is mainly described as post-trauma or post-surgery. But even in patients with subacromial pathologies, secondary shoulder stiffness is frequently observed. Current literature does rarely investigate on this type of shoulder stiffness. Thus therapy concepts are based on studies focusing on other entities of shoulder stiffness and arthroscopic capsular release is proclaimed the standard procedure. Since stiffness in patients with subacromial pathologies is often described as a moderate form of stiffness, it is important to evaluate whether a less invasive strategy produces an equal outcome. Manipulation under general anaesthesia has shown good results in patients suffering from shoulder stiffness secondary to rotator cuff tear. In contrast to an arthroscopic release, manipulation is a less invasive, time-saving treatment which demands a shorter training curve of the surgeon. In this clinical trial 40 patients with subacromial impingement and concomitant shoulder stiffness were treated with manipulation under general anaesthesia followed by arthroscopic subacromial decompression (ASD). A matched-pairs-analysis with a group of 40 patients suffering from impingement only and treated with ASD alone was carried out. The pre- and postoperative functional assessment included the UCLA as well as the Constant score with a mean follow-up of 4 years. The results of the Constant and UCLA score showed that all patients benefit from the performed therapy. Values for pain, range of motion, muscle-strength and ability to perform daily work improved in both groups. At the end of the follow-up significant differences in motion were only detectable for internal rotation. In comparison to previous studies on arthroscopic release, the patients in this survey reached matchable scores. In summary, manipulation under anaesthesia followed by ASD is a sufficient operative procedure in patients suffering from subacromial impingement and concomitant shoulder stiffness providing results as good as the ones non-stiff patients can expect. The procedure can be performed faster, easier and less invasive than arthroscopic capsular release.
机译:肩膀的僵硬可以是主要形式,也可以是次要形式。继发性肩膀僵硬主要描述为创伤后或手术后。但是,即使在肩峰以下病变的患者中,也经常观察到继发性肩膀僵硬。当前文献很少对此类型的肩膀僵硬进行研究。因此,治疗的概念是基于侧重于肩部僵硬的其他实体的研究,而关节镜下的荚膜释放被称为标准程序。由于肩峰以下病变患者的僵硬通常被描述为僵硬的中度形式,因此评估侵入性较小的策略是否产生相同的结果非常重要。对于继发于肩袖撕裂继发的肩膀僵硬的患者,在全身麻醉下进行操作已显示出良好的效果。与关节镜释放相反,操纵是一种侵入性较小,节省时间的治疗,需要较短的外科医生训练曲线。在这项临床试验中,对40例伴有肩峰以下撞击并伴有肩部僵硬的患者在全身麻醉下进行手法治疗,然后进行关节镜下肩峰下减压(ASD)。进行配对分析,分析了40名仅遭受撞击并仅接受ASD治疗的患者。术前和术后功能评估包括UCLA以及Constant评分,平均随访4年。 Constant和UCLA评分的结果表明,所有患者均从进行的治疗中受益。两组的疼痛,运动范围,肌肉力量和日常工作能力均得到改善。在随访结束时,只有内部旋转才能检测到明显的运动差异。与先前有关关节镜释放的研究相比,本次调查的患者达到了可匹配的分数。综上所述,麻醉后伴有ASD的操作对于肩峰以下撞击和肩部僵硬的患者是足够的手术方法,其效果与非僵硬患者所期望的一样好。该过程可以比关节镜的囊袋释放更快,更容易且侵入性更小。

著录项

  • 作者

    Peiffer Simon;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 ger
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号