首页> 外文OA文献 >Common Mechanisms Underlying the Proconflict Effects of Corticotropin-Releasing Factor, A Benzodiazepine Inverse Agonist and Electric Foot-Shock
【2h】

Common Mechanisms Underlying the Proconflict Effects of Corticotropin-Releasing Factor, A Benzodiazepine Inverse Agonist and Electric Foot-Shock

机译:促肾上腺皮质激素释放因子,苯二氮卓类激动剂和电击脚的前冲作用的常见机制

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The effects of corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF), a benzodiazepine inverse agonist (methyl-6,7-dimethoxy-4-ethyl-β-carboline-3-carboxylate; DMCM) and electric foot-shock on rat conflict behavior were characterized and compared. Rats were trained to lever press under a multiple fixed-ratio schedule (FR 20) of food reinforcement in which responses during the first component were not punished, and the first response of each FR during the second component produced electric shock of an intensity sufficient to suppress responding by 10% to 15%. Intracerebroventricular injection of CRF (0.1-5.6 µg) caused a dose-dependent decrease in the rate of responding in both components of the schedule. However, CRF was more potent in decreasing rates of punished responding (proconflict effect). DMCM (10-100 µg; i.c.v.) also decreased rates of punished and nonpunished responding and was more potent during the punishment component. The suppression of punished and nonpunished responding by CRF and DMCM was mimicked by increasing the shock intensity (Δ = 0.1 to 0.6 mA) during the punishment component. To determine whether CRF, DMCM and electric shock shared common mechanisms for these effects, rats were pretreated with i.c.v. injections of either a CRF antagonist (α helical CRF9-41, 50 µg), a benzodiazepine agonist (chlordiazepoxide, 10 µg) or a benzodiazepine antagonist (flumazenil, 10 µg) before the administration of equieffective doses of CRF or DMCM or an increase in shock intensity. Chlordiazepoxide attenuated the effects of all three stimuli. Flumazenil antagonized DMCM and CRF, but not shock, implicating a pharmacologic interaction between CRF and benzodiazepine systems. In contrast, α helical CRF9-41 antagonized CRF and shock, but not DMCM, suggesting that the effects of shock, but not of DMCM, may be due to endogeneous CRF release. Together, the present results indicate that the proconflict effects of CRF, DMCM and electric foot-shock share some common mechanisms and that the effects produced by CRF may require the release of an endogenous benzodiazepine inverse agonist.
机译:表征了促肾上腺皮质激素释放因子(CRF),苯二氮卓类反向激动剂(-6,7-二甲氧基-4-乙基-β-咔啉-3-羧酸甲酯; DMCM)和电击脚对大鼠冲突行为的影响,比较。对大鼠进行了训练,使其按照多种固定比例的食物强化时间表(FR 20)进行压榨,其中第一部分的反应没有受到惩罚,而第二部分中每个FR的第一反应产生的电击强度足以抑制响应10%到15%。脑室内注射CRF(0.1-5.6 µg)导致时间表中两个部分的反应率呈剂量依赖性降低。但是,CRF在降低惩罚响应率(冲突效应)方面更为有效。 DMCM(10-100 µg; i.c.v。)也降低了惩罚和未惩罚响应的速度,并且在惩罚阶段更有效。通过增加惩罚期间的电击强度(Δ= 0.1至0.6 mA)来模仿CRF和DMCM对惩罚和非惩罚响应的抑制。为了确定CRF,DMCM和电击是否共享这些作用的共同机制,将大鼠经静脉内预处理。在给予等效剂量的CRF或DMCM或增加CRF剂量之前,先注射CRF拮抗剂(α螺旋CRF9-41,50 µg),苯二氮卓激动剂(氯二氮卓,10 µg)或苯二氮卓拮抗剂(氟马西尼,10 µg)。冲击强度。氯二氮卓减弱了所有三种刺激的作用。氟马西尼拮抗DMCM和CRF,但不引起休克,暗示CRF和苯二氮卓系统之间存在药理相互作用。相反,α螺旋CRF9-41拮抗CRF和休克,但不拮抗DMCM,这表明休克(而非DMCM)的作用可能是由于内源性CRF释放。总之,目前的结果表明,CRF,DMCM和电击脚的冲突作用具有一些共同的机制,并且CRF产生的作用可能需要释放内源性苯二氮卓类反向激动剂。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号