首页> 外文OA文献 >The effects of long-term debt on a firm's new product pricing policy in duopolistic markets
【2h】

The effects of long-term debt on a firm's new product pricing policy in duopolistic markets

机译:双寡头市场中长期债务对公司新产品定价政策的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

While many marketing models ignore the influence of financial variables on a firm's marketing strategy, this paper explores the effect of debt on the profit maximizing price for a new product. We assume a duopolistic market structure in which two firms produce a heterogeneous new consumer durable that is sold over two different periods. Firms know market demand in the first period with certainty, while demand in the second period is uncertain. Moreover, firms have free access to the capital market and finance part of their operating costs by issuing long-term debt. In this setting, we study the influence of long-term debt on firms' pricing policies. It turns out that leveraged firms compared to unleveraged ones have different pricing strategies. In particular, first-period prices are lower and second-period prices are higher in case of long-term debt than in case of no leverage. Finally we find that prices for firms that take on debtare less volatile than prices for purely equity financed firms.
机译:尽管许多营销模型都忽略了财务变量对公司营销策略的影响,但本文还是探讨了债务对新产品利润最大化价格的影响。我们假设一个双寡头的市场结构,其中两家公司生产的异类新耐用消费品在两个不同时期出售。企业可以确定地了解第一阶段的市场需求,而第二阶段的需求则不确定。此外,企业可以自由进入资本市场,并通过发行长期债务来为其部分运营成本融资。在这种情况下,我们研究了长期债务对企业定价政策的影响。事实证明,与非杠杆公司相比,杠杆公司具有不同的定价策略。特别是,与没有杠杆的情况相比,长期债务的第一期价格较低,而第二期的价格较高。最后,我们发现承担债务的公司的价格波动要比纯股权融资公司的价格波动小。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号