首页> 外文OA文献 >Incorporating evidence and politics in health policy: Can institutionalising evidence review make a difference?
【2h】

Incorporating evidence and politics in health policy: Can institutionalising evidence review make a difference?

机译:将证据和政治纳入卫生政策:将证据审查制度化可以有所作为吗?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Much of the evidence translation literature focuses narrowly on the use of evidence in the initial policy formulation stages, and downplays the crucial role of institutions and the inherently political nature of policy making. More recent approaches acknowledge the importance of institutional and political factors, but make no attempt to incorporate their influence into new models of evidence translation. To address this issue, this article uses data from a comparative case study of bowel cancer screening policy in Australia, the United Kingdom and New Zealand, to propose alternative models of evidence incorporation which apply to all stages of the policy process.
机译:许多证据翻译文献只在最初的政策制定阶段就集中关注证据的使用,而淡化了机构的关键作用和政策制定的固有政治性质。最近的方法承认体制和政治因素的重要性,但没有尝试将其影响纳入新的证据翻译模型。为了解决这个问题,本文使用来自澳大利亚,英国和新西兰的肠癌筛查政策比较案例研究的数据,提出了适用于政策流程各个阶段的替代证据合并模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号