首页> 外文OA文献 >Perception, Content and Conceptual Engagement: Is there any non-conceptual content?
【2h】

Perception, Content and Conceptual Engagement: Is there any non-conceptual content?

机译:感知,内容和概念参与:是否存在任何非概念性内容?

摘要

This thesis aims to compensate for the defects in the forms of conceptualism which JohnudMcDowell (1994a) and Bill Brewer (1999) hold: it does this by analysing the conceptualudstructure of the content of experience using colour experience as the central case.udFirst, the root of the debate between conceptualism and non-conceptualism, as I shalludargue, is the different notions of concept and experience used by the two sides. The nonconceptualists’udnotion of a concept, or conceptual capacity, has been defined veryudnarrowly, satisfying very restricted conditions, whereas their notion of experience isudmuch wider and more flexible, ranging from a subpersonal state to a personal level. Byudcontrast, conceptualists are quite open to broad notions of a concept, or conceptualudcapacity, but seem to define the content of experience as belonging only to the personaludlevel.udSecond, in order to build a bridge between these two different notions of both conceptudand experience respectively, I will argue that three major types of conceptual capacitiesudcan operate in experience. I call this ‘conceptual engagement’. I then suggest that weudneed to consider two perspectives on colour experience: namely, the functional and theudexpository. The former concerns ‘how experience physically works’, whereas the latterudconcerns “what experience has.” Both perspectives will prove useful for explainingudperceptual content at the sub-personal and personal level. This distinction is requiredudbecause what we call the ‘content’ of experience does not belong to just one particularudstage of experience.udLast, as a final supplementation of previous conceptualism, I will consider theuddiscrimination abilities involved in perception as being themselves a type of conceptualudcapacity. At this point, I will adopt the notion of receptivity as used by McDowellud(1994a), but deny that a conceptualist is committed to spontaneity being involved inudreceptivity. I will further propose that understanding discriminative abilities asudperceptual receptivity could prepare the ground for taking over perceptual contents intoudthe contents of thought. I will argue that perception could be passive and conceptual,udhence separate from spontaneity.
机译:本文旨在弥补John udMcDowell(1994a)和Bill Brewer(1999)持有的概念主义形式的缺陷:它通过以色彩体验为中心分析体验内容的概念 udstructure。首先,正如我将要提倡的那样,概念主义与非概念主义之间争论的根源是双方使用的不同的概念和经验概念。非概念主义者对概念或概念能力的理解非常狭ud,满足了非常有限的条件,而他们的体验概念则更广泛,更灵活,从亚个人状态到个人水平。通过 udcontrast,概念主义者对一个概念或概念 udcapacity的宽泛概念持开放态度,但是似乎将体验的内容定义为仅属于个人 udlevel。 udSecond,以便在这两个不同的人之间建立桥梁在概念 ud和经验这两个概念上,我将论证三种主要类型的概念能力 udcan在经验中起作用。我称之为“概念参与”。然后,我建议我们需要考虑关于色彩体验的两种观点:即功能性和非官方性。前者关注“体验如何在身体上起作用”,而后者则关注“体验具有什么意义”。两种观点都将被证明有助于在亚个人和个人层面上解释超知的内容。这种区分是必需的因为我们所谓的体验的“内容”不仅仅属于一个特定的经验的阶段。 ud最后,作为对先前概念主义的最终补充,我将认为感知所涉及的歧视能力是本身就是一种概念能力。在这一点上,我将采用麦克道尔(McDowell)(1994a)所使用的接受性的概念,但否认概念主义者致力于自发性参与了接受性。我将进一步提出,将辨别能力理解为“ ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 、、、、、、、、。我将认为感知可能是被动的和概念性的,理解与自发性是分开的。

著录项

  • 作者

    KIM TAE-KYUNG;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类
  • 入库时间 2022-08-31 14:57:09

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号