首页> 中文期刊> 《医学与社会》 >北京市城区全科医生工作内容的非参与观察研究

北京市城区全科医生工作内容的非参与观察研究

         

摘要

Objective:To investigate the working contents of General Practitioners (GPs) and existing problems in the urban area of Beijing.Methods:Six GPs in community health service institutions were selected by purposive sampling.Consecutive consultations and public health and administrative workload of the GPs were observed via non-participant observation.Results:Among the 1135 consultations,the most frequent complaint was prescription refill of chronic diseases (66.0%),followed by blood pressure measurement (8.8%),counseling (7.8%),cough (7.2%),measuring blood sugar (4.6%) etc.The most frequent consultation content was prescription (81.0%),followed by medication instruction (30.0%),history taking (27.0%),explanation of disease (21.9%),blood pressure measurement (19.6%) etc.The GPs were responsible for partial public health and administrative work,including health record related work (60 times),screening of stroke (60 times),pharmacy related work (27 times) etc.Conclusion:The consultation of the GPs did not embody the value of general practice.GPs' positioning should be better defined in the future to promote the quality of care.%目的:了解北京市城区全科医生的工作内容及存在的问题.方法:通过目的抽样,选取在社区卫生服务机构工作的6名全科医生.采用非参与观察法,观察全科医生的诊疗过程,以及观察期间全科医生承担的公共卫生和管理性工作情况.结果:在全科医生接诊的1135名患者中,最常见的主诉是慢性疾病取药(66.0%),其次为测量血压(8.8%)、咨询(7.8%)、咳嗽(7.2%)、查血糖(4.6%)等.全科医生最多的诊疗内容是开药(81.0%),其次是用药指导(30.0%)、问病史(27.0%)、解释病情(21.9%)和测量血压(19.6%)等.全科医生承担了较多公共卫生和管理性工作,包括健康档案相关工作(60次)、卒中筛查工作(60次)、药房相关工作(27次)等.结论:全科医生在诊疗中没有较好的体现全科医学的价值,应进一步明确全科医生的功能定位,提高全科医生的诊疗质量.

著录项

相似文献

  • 中文文献
  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号