Abstract:ududArchitecture and arts practices were arguably kept apart during the first half of the 20th century, resisting an emerging overlap that was conducted by both artists and architects. Installation art has subsequently emerged as an art practice but has shared many qualities with architecture because of its creation of spatial territory. Thus, in contemporary art, installation art has been moving in the fluxes between art and architecture. ududIn the case of installation art, a temporary space is created along with a new kind of engagement and perception of the places around us. It motivates the spectator’s imagination when they are inside, experiencing a shelter that is new to the context. At the same time, it motivates memories of that experience after the installation space is removed.ududMediating architecture with a spatial medium like an installation invites a new reading of the space to be applied. This reading opposes the interpretation of architecture as still signs, objects or still images, mainly because of the continuous unfolding of the art installation and the close involvement of the viewer in the spectating journey. Consequently, mediating the exhibition space through an installation creates narratives that are subjective and context-specific, while their transition through other mediums continues to alter the original narrative after the work is dismantled. ududDriven from the proposition that the event of a temporary installation can be articulated by the ‘event’; a concept that French philosopher Gilles Delleuze addresses in his study: The Fold, which considers the accumulated influence of a number of perceptions of space, the thesis discusses the alternative scenarios of reading the temporary architectural space while focusing on the narrative of these architectural happenings by referring mainly to Mieke Bal’s ‘narratology’ as an approach to this new understanding. Before experiencing examples of installation art, a methodological technique; collage- de-collage-re-collage, is presented as a tool to negotiate the narratives collected from the case studies. It is formulated after a theoretical structure is set to investigate the case studies where a need to develop tools of analysis and representation becomes obvious to the work. The study then tests the proposed theoretical framework on three examples, each of which represents a level of temporality in space. As they unfold, the study tracks the encounters that may be further used as instruments to extend the understanding of installation art in particular and temporary spaces in general. ud
展开▼
机译:可以说,建筑和艺术实践在20世纪上半叶是分开的,抵制了艺术家和建筑师之间不断出现的重叠。装置艺术后来作为一种艺术实践出现,但由于其空间领域的创造,与建筑具有许多共同点。因此,在当代艺术中,装置艺术一直在艺术与建筑之间的变化中运动。 ud ud在装置艺术的情况下,会创建一个临时空间,以及对周围环境的一种新的参与和感知。当观众进入室内时,它激发了观众的想象力,并体验了一个新的隐蔽处。同时,它会在移除安装空间后激发对这种体验的记忆。 ud ud使用诸如安装的空间介质来调解体系结构会引起对应用空间的新阅读。这种阅读反对将建筑解释为静止的标志,物体或静止的图像,这主要是因为艺术品的不断展开以及观众在观景之旅中的密切参与。因此,通过装置来调解展览空间会产生主观的和特定于情境的叙事,而通过其他媒介进行的过渡在作品被拆除后仍会改变原始的叙事。 ud ud基于“事件”可以表达临时安装事件的主张;法国哲学家吉勒斯·德勒兹(Gilles Delleuze)在其研究中提出的概念:《折页》(Fold)考虑了许多空间感知的累积影响,本文讨论了阅读临时建筑空间的替代方案,同时着重研究了这些建筑事件的叙述。主要是指迈克·巴尔(Mieke Bal)的“叙事学”,作为对这种新认识的一种方法。在体验装置艺术的例子之前,先介绍一种方法学上的技巧; Collage-de-collage-re-collage作为一种工具,用于协商从案例研究中收集的叙述。它是在设定了理论结构以调查案例研究之后制定的,在案例研究中,需要开发分析和表示工具的需求对工作显而易见。然后,研究在三个示例上测试了提出的理论框架,每个示例都代表了空间的时间性水平。随着研究的进行,研究会追踪这些相遇,这些相遇可能会进一步用作扩大对安装艺术(尤其是临时空间)的理解的工具。 ud
展开▼