首页> 外文OA文献 >Fate of plant protection products in soilless cultivations after drip irrigation: measured vs. modelled concentrations : Interpretation of the 2014 experiment with the Substance Emission Model
【2h】

Fate of plant protection products in soilless cultivations after drip irrigation: measured vs. modelled concentrations : Interpretation of the 2014 experiment with the Substance Emission Model

机译:滴灌后无土栽培中植物保护产品的命运:实测浓度与模型浓度:用物质排放模型解释2014年的实验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The Greenhouse Emission Model has recently been adopted as a model package for assessing emissions to and concentrations in groundwater and surface water after use of plant protection products in greenhouse crops. Stakeholders advised that the model be tested against experimental data. ududIn October 2014, facilities of WUR Plant Research were used to perform a pilot experiment in which cucumber plants on stone wool substrate were treated with three plant protection products, using a drip irrigation method. Concentrations of the active substances were measured in both the water flowing to and draining from the substrate. GEM was tailored to the experimental conditions and used to predict concentrations in parts of the experimental system. Measured and simulated concentrations of imidacloprid and fluopyram were comparable from approximately 36 hours after the start of the experiment onwards. Prior to this, concentrations in the inflowing water were underestimated and concentrations in the drain water were overestimated, probably because of incomplete mixing. For dimethomorph, agreement between the measured and calculated concentrations was reached after approximately 80 hours. This more lengthy period may be due to exceeding the solubility of the substance, causing precipitation or settling on the tube walls, and redissolving later on; the model does not account for these processes. ududDegradation of all three substances was found to be negligible over the duration of the experiment. Plant uptake was the major dissipation process. Experimental results show that uptake of substances was lower than uptake of water, thereby supporting the transpiration stream concentration approach proposed by Briggs et al. (1982); this approach is often applied however experimental evidence is scarce. Transpiration stream concentration factors far below one were found to fit experimental results best.
机译:温室气体排放模型最近已被用作模型套件,用于评估在温室作物中使用植物保护产品后地下水和地表水中的排放量和浓度。利益相关者建议对模型进行实验数据测试。 ud ud在2014年10月,WUR植物研究中心的设施用于进行中试实验,其中采用滴灌法用三种植物保护产品对石棉基质上的黄瓜植物进行了处理。在流入和流出基材的水中都测量了活性物质的浓度。 GEM针对实验条件进行了调整,并用于预测实验系统各部分的浓度。从实验开始约36小时开始,吡虫啉和氟吡虫酰胺的测量和模拟浓度是可比的。在此之前,可能是由于混合不充分,低估了流入水中的浓度,而高估了排水中的浓度。对于二甲吗啡,在大约80小时后,测量浓度和计算浓度之间达到一致。更长的时间可能是由于超过了物质的溶解度,导致了管壁上的沉淀或沉淀,随后又重新溶解。该模型不考虑这些过程。 ud ud在实验过程中所有三种物质的降解均可以忽略不计。植物吸收是主要的耗散过程。实验结果表明,物质的吸收低于水的吸收,从而支持了Briggs等人提出的蒸腾流浓缩方法。 (1982);通常采用这种方法,但是缺乏实验证据。发现蒸腾流的浓度因子远低于1,最适合实验结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号