首页> 外文OA文献 >Assessment on bulk solids best practice techniques for flow characterization and storage/handling equipment design for biomass materials of different classes
【2h】

Assessment on bulk solids best practice techniques for flow characterization and storage/handling equipment design for biomass materials of different classes

机译:评估用于不同类别生物质材料的流量表征和存储/处理设备设计的散装固体最佳实践技术

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper shows the results of a collaborative project in which four different laboratories have carried out complementary characterization tests on samples of the same set of lignocellulosic biomass materials with the objectives of better understanding their properties and identifying any critical features of the different characterization procedures. Three different types of material were used as model biomasses: 1) Scots pine wood chips, as an example of a coarse and flaky particulate biomass with some elastic properties; 2) chopped straw of reed canary grass as a nesting biomass having long and flaky fibers; and 3) Scots pine wood powder as a fine particulate with elastic and cohesive properties. Particle size and shape analyses were carried out with; calipers, 2D image analysis, 3D image analysis (ScanChip) and through mechanical sieving. Applications and validity limits of each of these techniques are evaluated and discussed. The flow function and internal friction were determined with a Schulze ring shear tester, a Brookfield powder flow tester and a large ring shear tester. No significant differences in the results generated by these shear testing techniques were found. Wall friction measurements were carried out with a Schulze ring shear tester; a Brookfield powder flow tester; a large Jenike shear tester and a Casagrande shear box. Results, in this case, showed significant differences with a higher wall friction coefficient obtained with the larger shear cell. Additionally, tensile strengths of biomass materials were measured by the use of a novel measurement technique. Arching tests were carried out in a pilot scale plane silo with variable hopper geometry and results were compared with those predicted by applying the Jenike procedure and a modified procedure which assumed that tensile strength was the controlling material property (rather than unconfined yield strength). Finally, safety of handling and storage was assessed by carrying out explosion tests on dusts from Scots pine and reed canary grass.
机译:本文显示了一个合作项目的结果,其中四个不同的实验室对同一组木质纤维素生物质材料的样品进行了互补的表征测试,目的是更好地了解其特性并确定不同表征程序的任何关键特征。三种不同类型的材料用作模型生物质:1)苏格兰松木屑,作为具有一定弹性的粗粒状颗粒状生物质的示例; 2)切碎的芦苇金丝雀草秸秆作为嵌套的生物质,具有长而片状的纤维; 3)苏格兰松木粉,为细颗粒,具有弹性和内聚性。进行粒度和形状分析。卡尺,2D图像分析,3D图像分析(ScanChip)以及通过机械筛分。对每种技术的应用和有效性限制进行了评估和讨论。使用Schulze环形剪切测试仪,Brookfield粉末流动测试仪和大型环形剪切测试仪确定流动函数和内摩擦。在这些剪切测试技术产生的结果中没有发现显着差异。壁摩擦力的测量使用Schulze环形剪切试验仪进行; Brookfield粉末流动测试仪;大型Jenike剪切测试仪和Casagrande剪切盒。在这种情况下,结果显示出显着差异,而较大的剪切单元可获得更高的壁摩擦系数。另外,通过使用新颖的测量技术来测量生物质材料的抗张强度。拱形试验是在具有可变料斗几何形状的中型规模平面筒仓中进行的,并将结果与​​采用Jenike程序和修改的程序(假定拉伸强度是控制材料的性能(而不是无限制的屈服强度))预测的结果进行了比较。最后,通过对来自苏格兰松树和芦苇金丝雀草的灰尘进行爆炸测试,评估了处理和存储的安全性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号