首页> 外文OA文献 >Ridge, Moldboard, Chisel, and No-Till Effects on Tile Water Quality beneath Two Cropping Systems
【2h】

Ridge, Moldboard, Chisel, and No-Till Effects on Tile Water Quality beneath Two Cropping Systems

机译:两种种植系统下垄、,板,凿子和免耕对瓷砖水质的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Soil conservation tillage systems, including ridge-tillage, often reduce surface water contamination by pesticides because soil erosion and surface runoff are reduced. However, the effects on losses through subsurface drainage tile are somewhat uncertain. Our field study quantified the effects of four tillage practices in continuous corn (Zea mays L.) and corn-soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr] rotations on herbicide and nitrate N losses in tile drainage water. Fertilizer and pesticide application methods were uniform for ridge, moldboard, chisel, and no-till systems. Pesticide and nitrate N leaching losses were significantly affected by crop rotation. Tillage practice had little influence on nitrate N and pesticide losses to the subsurface drainage water within a corn-soybean rotation. However, ridge-till and no-till resulted in larger losses of atrazine than the moldboard plow and chisel based systems under continuous corn. Tillage system did not affect the timings of peak tile flow occurrences, although peak tile flow volume was affected by tillage, presumably because each system bad its own macropore system related to preservation or annual destruction of biopores by tillage. Corn yields were significantly higher under corn-soybean rotation than with continuous-corn for all tillage practices. These results indicate that continuous corn production is not an environmentally sustainable practice for this area because it resulted in higher nitrate N leaching losses to groundwater, received higher N-applications, and resulted in lower corn yields than the corn-soybean rotation. The results also reinforce the need for studies on chemical placement, rate, and timing for various tillage practices to reduce tile drainage losses of agricultural chemicals.
机译:由于减少了土壤侵蚀和地表径流,土壤保护性耕作系统(包括垄耕)通常减少了农药对地表水的污染。但是,通过地下排水瓦对损失的影响尚不确定。我们的田间研究量化了四种耕作方式对连续玉米(Zea mays L.)和玉米-大豆[Glycine max(L.)Merr]轮作方式对排水中除草剂和硝酸盐氮损失的影响。垄,mold,凿子和免耕系统的肥料和农药施用方法是一致的。轮作显着影响了农药和硝酸盐氮的淋失。在玉米-大豆轮作中,耕作方式对硝酸盐氮和农药向地下排水的损失几乎没有影响。但是,在连续玉米条件下,垄耕和免耕导致的r去津损失高于mold土犁和凿子基系统。耕作制度并没有影响瓷砖流量峰值的发生时间,尽管耕作流量影响了瓷砖峰值流量,大概是因为每个系统都破坏了自己的大孔系统,而该系统与耕作对生物孔的保存或年度破坏有关。在所有耕作方式下,玉米-大豆轮作方式下的玉米单产均高于连续玉米。这些结果表明,连续生产玉米对于该地区而言不是一种环境可持续的做法,因为它导致地下水中硝酸盐氮的淋失损失增加,氮素施用量增加,并且玉米单产比玉米-大豆轮作低。结果还增加了对各种耕作实践的化学物质放置,速率和时间进行研究的需要,以减少农用化学品的瓷砖排水损失。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号