首页> 外文OA文献 >EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE STUDENT TEAMS ACHIEVEMENT DIVISIONS (STAD) DENGAN PENDEKATAN PROBLEM SOLVING DITINJAUudDARI AKTIVITAS BELAJAR SISWA
【2h】

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE STUDENT TEAMS ACHIEVEMENT DIVISIONS (STAD) DENGAN PENDEKATAN PROBLEM SOLVING DITINJAUudDARI AKTIVITAS BELAJAR SISWA

机译:运用问题解决方法进行合作学习模型研究团队成就部门(STAD)方法的实验来自学生的学习活动

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The aim of the research was to determine the effect of learning models on learning achievement viewed from the student learning activity. The learning models compared were cooperative learning STAD with problem solving approach, cooperative learning STAD and conventional learning. The type of the research was a quasi-experimental research. The population was the students of high school in Merauke regency on academic year 2012/2013. The size of the sample was 291 students consisted of 98 students in the first experimental group, 100 students in the second experimental group and 93 students in the control group. The instruments used were questionnaire, and learning achievement test. The data was analyzed using analysis of variance. The conclusions of the research were as follows. (1) STAD with problem solving approach gives better learning achievement than STAD and conventional, and STAD gives better learning achievement than conventional. (2) The students with high learning activity have better learning achievement than the students with middle and low learning activity, and the students with middle learning activity have better learning achievement than the students with low learning activity. (3) For students with high learning activity, both STAD with problem solving approach and STAD, STAD and conventional give the same effectiveness, but STAD with problem solving approach is better than conventional. In the meantime, for students with middle and low learning activity, all learning models give the same effectiveness. (4) For using of STAD with problem solving approach and conventional, both the students with high and middle learning activity, the students with middle and low learning activity have the same learning achievement, but the students with high learning activity have better learning achievement than the students with low learning activity. In the meantime, for using of STAD, all students learning activities have the same learning achievement.
机译:该研究的目的是确定从学生的学习活动来看学习模型对学习成绩的影响。比较的学习模型是采用问题解决方法的协作学习STAD,协作学习STAD和常规学习。研究类型是准实验研究。人口是2012/2013学年Merauke县高中的学生。样本量为291名学生,其中第一实验组为98名学生,第二实验组为100名学生,对照组为93名学生。使用的工具是问卷和学习成绩测试。使用方差分析对数据进行分析。研究结论如下。 (1)带有问题解决方法的STAD提供比STAD和常规更好的学习成绩,STAD提供比常规更好的学习成绩。 (2)高学习活动的学生的学习成绩要好于中,低学习活动的学生,中学习活动的学生的成绩要好于低学习活动的学生。 (3)对于学习活动活跃的学生,采用问题解决方法的STAD和STAD,STAD和常规方法都具有相同的效果,但是采用问题解决方法的STAD优于常规方法。同时,对于学习活动中等和低下的学生,所有学习模式都具有相同的效果。 (4)对于使用具有问题解决方法和常规方法的STAD,高中学习活动的学生,中低学习活动的学生具有相同的学习成绩,但高学习活动的学生的学习成绩要高于学习活动低的学生。同时,对于使用STAD,所有学生的学习活动都具有相同的学习成绩。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号