首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparative assessment of the co-evolution of environmental indicator systems in Japan and China
【2h】

Comparative assessment of the co-evolution of environmental indicator systems in Japan and China

机译:中日环境指标体系共同演进的比较评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper analyzes the evolution of environmental policies and the related indicator systems that have been introduced in both Japan and China. The findings reveal that the lack of both natural resources and space for the final disposal of wastes, resulted in Japanese policy placing special emphasis on, initially, waste treatment technologies with high capacities such as incineration, and more recently, on integrated resource management. This trend is also reflected in the recycling targets for specific waste policies proposed in the 1990s and the introduction of comprehensive resource management indicators in the early 2000s. In China, the impressive economic growth of the last decades has relied both on coal as the primary energy source and mostly small scale industries for production. However, the environmental impacts and low energy efficiency associated with both coal-power plants and small-scale industry forced the government to introduce emission reduction targets followed by energy efficiency and macro energy intensity indicators. While the importance of indicator systems and policies has been demonstrated for specific cases, such policies are not yet comprehensive. This is reflected by the finding that while Japan has improved both its resource productivity and reduced total direct material inputs into the economy, overall CO2 emissions and waste generation have increased. China also suffered a setback when its overall energy intensity started to increase in 2000 after 20 years of improvement. This study argues that a comprehensive sustainability policy is necessary in order to overcome the problems associated with production and consumption patterns and their impact on the environment. In this sense it is important to consider the different comprehensive assessment methods proposed by the scientific community in the policy making process. Finally the paper proposes that the experience of Japan and China in dealing with environmental issues could be an important reference for policy development in Asia.
机译:本文分析了日本和中国引入的环境政策及其相关指标体系的演变。研究结果表明,由于缺乏自然资源和最终废物处理的空间,日本的政策开始特别侧重于焚烧等高容量废物处理技术,最近更侧重于资源综合管理。 1990年代提出的具体废物政策的回收目标和2000年代初期采用的综合资源管理指标也反映了这一趋势。在中国,过去几十年令人印象深刻的经济增长不仅依靠煤炭作为主要能源,而且主要依靠小规模生产。然而,与燃煤电厂和小型工业相关的环境影响和低能效迫使政府引入了减排目标,随后是能效和宏观能源强度指标。虽然已针对特定情况证明了指标体系和政策的重要性,但此类政策尚未全面。这一发现反映了这一点,即日本既提高了资源生产率,又减少了对经济的直接材料总投入,但总的二氧化碳排放量和废物产生量却增加了。经过20年的改善,中国的整体能源强度在2000年开始增加,中国也遭受了挫折。这项研究认为,必须采取一项全面的可持续发展政策,以克服与生产和消费方式及其对环境的影响有关的问题。从这个意义上讲,重要的是要在决策过程中考虑科学界提出的各种综合评估方法。最后,本文提出日本和中国在处理环境问题上的经验可以为亚洲制定政策提供重要参考。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号