BackgroundThe combination of voluntary effort and functional electrical stimulation (ES) appears to have a greater potential to induce plasticity in the motor cortex than either electrical stimulation or voluntary training alone. However, it is not clear whether the motor commands from the central nervous system, the afferent input from peripheral organs, or both, are indispensable to induce the facilitative effects on cortical excitability. To clarify whether voluntary motor commands enhance corticospinal tract (CoST) excitability during neuromuscular ES, without producing voluntary muscular contraction (VMC), we examined the effect of a combination of motor imagery (MI) and electrical muscular stimulation on CoST excitability using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS).MethodsEight neurologically healthy male subjects participated in this study. Five conditions (resting, MI, ES, ES + MI [ESMI], and VMC) were established. In the ES condition, a 50-Hz stimulus was applied for 3 to 5 s to the first dorsal interosseous (FDI) while subjects were relaxed. In the MI condition, subjects were instructed to imagine abducting their index finger. In the ESMI condition, ES was applied approximately 1 s after the subject had begun to imagine index finger abduction. In the VMC condition, subjects modulated the force of index finger abduction to match a target level, which was set at the level produced during the ES condition. TMS was applied on the hotspot for FDI, and the amplitude and latency of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were measured under each condition.ResultsMEP amplitudes during VMC and ESMI were significantly larger than those during other conditions; there was no significant difference in MEP amplitude between these 2 conditions. The latency of MEPs evoked during MI and VMC were significantly shorter than were those evoked during rest and ES.ConclusionsMEP acutely reinforced in ESMI may indicate that voluntary motor drive markedly contributes to enhance CoST excitability, without actual muscular contraction.
展开▼
机译:背景技术与单独的电刺激或自愿训练相比,自愿努力和功能性电刺激(ES)的结合似乎具有更大的诱发运动皮层可塑性的潜力。然而,尚不清楚来自中枢神经系统的运动命令,来自周围器官的传入输入或两者是否对诱发对皮层兴奋性的促进作用必不可少。为了阐明自愿运动命令是否在神经肌肉ES期间增强皮质脊髓束(CoST)兴奋性而不产生自愿性肌肉收缩(VMC),我们研究了经颅磁刺激结合运动图像(MI)和电刺激肌肉对CoST兴奋性的影响方法:八名神经系统健康的男性受试者参加了这项研究。建立了五个条件(休息,MI,ES,ES ++ MI [ESMI]和VMC)。在ES情况下,在受试者放松的同时,对第一背骨间(FDI)施加50 Hz刺激3至5 s。在心梗状态下,受试者被要求想象绑架食指。在ESMI条件下,在受试者开始想象食指绑架后约1 s内应用ES。在VMC状态下,受试者调节食指绑架的力以匹配目标水平,该目标水平设定为ES条件下产生的水平。在FDI热点上应用了TMS,并测量了每种情况下的电机诱发电位(MEP)的幅度和潜伏期。结果VMC和ESMI期间的MEP幅度明显大于其他条件下的MEP幅度。在这两个条件之间,MEP振幅没有显着差异。在MI和VMC期间诱发的MEP的潜伏期明显比在休息和ES期间诱发的MEP的潜伏期短。结论ESMI中急性增强的MEP可能表明,自愿运动明显促进了CoST兴奋性,而没有实际的肌肉收缩。
展开▼