首页> 外文OA文献 >Notions of tradition and modernity in Italian critical debates of the 1920s
【2h】

Notions of tradition and modernity in Italian critical debates of the 1920s

机译:1920年代意大利批判性辩论中的传统与现代概念

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This thesis explores various redefinitions of the notions of tradition andudmodernity in the Italian critical debates of the 1920s.udIn the years immediately following the war and throughout the 1920s the problem ofudthe redefinition of the concepts of tradition and modernity appears to acquire preeminenceudwithin the critical debates. In the general atmosphere of the post-warud'return to order' and with a widespread feeling that the end of the war coincides withudthe beginning of a new epoch, many artists and intellectuals feel the necessity ofudredefining the terms of critical judgement in relation to the changed culturaludcircumstances. In this context, the definition of modernity is gradually deprived of itsudassociations with the concepts of 'the new' and progress and becomes strictlyudinterrelated with the notion of a return to tradition, interpreted as the continuation ofudthe dialogue with the past, which was interrupted by pre-war avant-garde artistic andudliterary excesses. Particular emphasis is placed on the varying politicization of theseudconcepts and their redefinition in terms of nationalism and internationalism.udThe complexities, contradictions and ambiguities created by such redefinitions areudexplored through the analysis of the periodicals Valori Plastici, La Ronda, CriticaudFascista, Il Selvaggio, 900, Il Baretti and Solaria, and of the critical work of EugenioudMontale, Ardengo Soffici and Luigi Pirandello, three very important figures, who areudsignificant participants in 1920s debates and have a prominent role in shaping theudculture of the decade.udThe notion of debate, within which the analysis of the concepts of tradition andudmodernity is inscribed, is broadly interpreted, taking into account the milieu of theudcultura militante during the inter-war period.udThe issues treated are problematized in the light of present-day scholarly debates,udwith a view to repositioning the material analysed and furthering such debates.
机译:本文探讨了在1920年代的意大利批判性辩论中对传统和“现代性”概念的各种重新定义。 ud在战后和整个1920年代,传统和现代性概念的“重新定义”问题似乎逐渐得到解决。在批判性辩论中占优。在战后“恢复秩序”的普遍气氛中,人们普遍感觉到战争的结束与新纪元的开始相吻合,许多艺术家和知识分子感到有必要“重新定义”术语。关于文化环境的批判性判断。在这种情况下,现代性的定义逐渐被“新”和进步的概念所剥夺,不再与“回归”联系起来,而与回归传统的观念严格相互关联,这被解释为与过去对话的延续。 ,这被战前前卫的艺术和文学过度所打断。这些 udconcepts的政治化及其在民族主义和国际主义方面的重新定义尤其受到重视。 udFascista,Il Selvaggio,900,Il Baretti和Solaria,以及Eugenio udMontale,Ardengo Soffici和Luigi Pirandello的批判工作,这三个非常重要的人物都是1920年辩论中的重要参与者,在塑造“世界末日”方面发挥了重要作用。 ud辩论的概念得到了广泛的解释,其中考虑了两次世界大战期间的 udcultura militante的环境。 ud这个辩论概念在其中阐述了传统和 udmodernity的概念。鉴于目前的学术辩论,对这种药物的治疗存在问题,目的是重新定位所分析的材料并促进此类辩论。

著录项

  • 作者

    Storchi S.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2001
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号