首页> 外文OA文献 >Personalization in the health care system: do personal health budgets impact on outcomes and cost?
【2h】

Personalization in the health care system: do personal health budgets impact on outcomes and cost?

机译:卫生保健系统中的个性化:个人卫生预算是否会影响结果和成本?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objectives In England’s National Health Service, personal health budgets are part of a growing trend to give patients more choice and control over how health care services are managed and delivered. The personal health budget programme was launched by the Department of Health in 2009, and a three-year independent evaluation was commissioned with the aim of identifying whether the initiative ensured better health- and care-related outcomes and at what cost when compared to conventional service delivery. ududMethods The evaluation used a pragmatic controlled trial design to compare the outcomes and costs of patients selected to receive a personal health budget with those continuing with conventional support arrangements (control group). Just over 1000 individuals were recruited into the personal health budget group and 1000 into the control group in order to ensure sufficient statistical power, and followed for 12 months. ududResults The use of personal health budgets was associated with significant improvement in patients’ care-related quality of life and psychological wellbeing at 12 months. Personal health budgets did not appear to have an impact on health status, mortality rates, health-related quality of life or costs over the same period. With net benefits measured in terms of care-related quality of life on the adult social care outcome toolkit measure, personal health budgets were cost-effective: that is, budget holders experienced greater benefits than people receiving conventional services, and the budgets were worth the cost. ududConclusion The evaluation provides support for the planned wider roll-out of personal health budgets in the English NHS after 2014 in so far as the localities in the pilot sample are representative of the whole country.
机译:目标在英格兰的国家卫生服务局中,个人卫生预算是不断增长的趋势的一部分,该预算旨在为患者提供更多选择和控制医疗服务的管理和交付方式。卫生部于2009年启动了个人健康预算计划,并委托进行了为期三年的独立评估,目的是确定该计划是否确保更好的与健康和护理相关的结果,以及与传统服务相比所花费的成本交货。 ud udMethods评估使用务实的对照试验设计,比较了选择接受个人健康预算的患者和接受常规支持安排的患者(对照组)的结局和费用。为了确保足够的统计能力,刚招募了超过1000个人进入了个人健康预算组,并招募了1000个人进入了对照组,随后进行了12个月的随访。 ud ud结果使用个人健康预算与患者在12个月时与护理相关的生活质量和心理健康显着改善有关。个人健康预算似乎并未对同期的健康状况,死亡率,与健康相关的生活质量或费用产生影响。根据成人社会护理结果工具包中与护理相关的生活质量来衡量的净收益,个人卫生预算具有成本效益:也就是说,预算持有者比接受常规服务的人享有更大的收益,而且预算值得成本。 ud ud结论结论该评估为2014年后英语NHS中计划扩大的个人健康预算提供了支持,因为试点样本中的地区代表了整个国家。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号