首页> 外文OA文献 >The use of electric pulse training aids (EPTAs) in companion animals
【2h】

The use of electric pulse training aids (EPTAs) in companion animals

机译:在伴侣动物中使用电脉冲教具(EPTA)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

There is currently little regulation of training and behaviour modificationudprocesses in the UK (CAWC 2008) besides measures enshrined in the AnimaludWelfare Act 2006 and a voluntary Code of Practice launched in 2010 (see:udhttp://www.cawc.org.uk/080603.pdf). This Code is consistent with current UKudlegislation outside of Wales and emphasises the need to safeguard theudwelfare of all interested parties involved in the “training contract” (animals andudpeople alike) and the importance of adopting sound scientific methods withinudthe skills base of the practitioner. There is much debate and opinion overudwhether the use of certain training techniques and devices meet theseudrequirements, especially the use of electric pulse training aids (EPTAs). AnudEPTA is defined for the purposes of this report as a device designed for use inudthe training of dogs, cats and other companion animal species, which involvesudthe application of an electric current to the skin to aid the training process. InudWales the use of all electronic collars has been banned ostensibly on animaludwelfare grounds, including those related to boundary fencing (The AnimaludWelfare (Electronic Collars) (Wales) Regulations 2010). It has beenudsuggested that there are currently around 350000 EPTAs in the UK, althoughudthe number in active use is unknown. Nonetheless they clearly represent audsignificant practice within the sphere of animal training and it is appropriateudthat careful consideration be given to their use, especially when there appearsudto be so much contradictory information available and such passionately heldudconvictions (often linked to ethical and animal welfare concerns) by thoseudexpressing an opinion. This report critically reviews current evidence andudarguments used both for and against the use of such devices and theudconclusions drawn. It highlights gaps in our knowledge and awareness of bothudtheory and practice. Recommendations are drawn on this basis.
机译:除了2006年动物福利法和2010年启动的自愿性行为准则(见: udhttp://www.cawc。)之外,英国目前几乎没有关于培训和行为改变 udprocess的法规(CAWC 2008)。 org.uk/080603.pdf)。该《准则》与威尔士以外的当前英国立法一致,并强调有必要保护参与“培训合同”的所有有关方(动物和 u u u u200b u003d u003f u003c u003f u003c从业者的技能基础。关于是否使用某些训练技术和设备来满足这些要求,存在很多争论和观点,尤其是使用电脉冲训练辅助工具(EPTA)。为了本报告的目的,将EPTA定义为设计用于训练狗,猫和其他伴侣动物物种的设备,该设备涉及向皮肤施加电流以辅助训练过程。在动物保护方面,表面上禁止使用所有电子项圈,包括与围栏有关的理由(《动物电子福利(电子项圈)(威尔士)法规,2010)》。有人建议,尽管在英国,目前大约有35万个EPTA,但仍未发现有效使用数量。尽管如此,它们显然代表了动物训练领域中的一种'微不足道的实践, u n应仔细考虑对它们的使用,特别是当似乎 udd可用的矛盾信息如此之多,并且这种热情持有的 udconviction(通常与道德和动物福利方面的关注)。该报告严格审查了当前证据和用于或反对使用此类设备和得出的结论的证据。它突出了我们在理论和实践方面的知识和意识的差距。在此基础上提出建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号