Previous studies of ownership structure mainly focus on the relationship between insider ownership and corporate performance. However, empirical results have failed to provide consistent evidence to prove whether the type of ownership does significant affect firm performance. Our paper fills this gap by classifying different types of shareholders (individual shareholders and institutional shareholders) and observes their relationship with corporate value respectively. In addition, we examine quarterly panel data and indirect ownership to address the problem of endogeneity argued Demetz (2001). udOur results show that only institutional ownership has consistent and significant relationship with firm value in both yearly regressions and panel data regression, while the relationship between individual ownership and firm value is not significant. Institutional ownership first decreases then increases firm value as institutional shareholders hold higher stakes in the firm. However, the effect of institutional ownership is counteracted when individuals have unexpectedly high levels of ownership. We also find that if institutional shareholders acquire more shares during a quarter, the change in firm value during this period is positive. Our results support the hypothesis that firm value creation is higher if the largest shareholder is an institutional investor.ud
展开▼
机译:以前关于所有权结构的研究主要集中在内部人所有权与公司绩效之间的关系上。但是,经验结果未能提供一致的证据来证明所有权类型是否确实对公司绩效产生重大影响。本文通过对不同类型的股东(个人股东和机构股东)进行分类来填补这一空白,并分别观察了它们与公司价值的关系。此外,我们研究了季度面板数据和间接所有权,以解决内生性问题(Demetz,2001)。 ud我们的结果表明,在年度回归和面板数据回归中,只有机构所有权与公司价值具有一致且显着的关系,而个人所有权与公司价值之间的关系并不显着。随着机构股东持有公司较高的股份,机构所有权首先下降,然后增加公司价值。但是,当个人拥有出乎意料的高所有权水平时,就会抵消机构所有权的影响。我们还发现,如果机构股东在一个季度内获得更多的股份,那么在此期间公司价值的变化是正的。我们的结果支持以下假设:如果最大股东是机构投资者,则公司价值创造会更高。 ud
展开▼