首页> 外文OA文献 >Tracking soil temperature and moisture in a multi-factor climate experiment in temperate grassland: Do climate manipulation methods produce their intended effects?
【2h】

Tracking soil temperature and moisture in a multi-factor climate experiment in temperate grassland: Do climate manipulation methods produce their intended effects?

机译:在温带草原的多因素气候实验中跟踪土壤温度和湿度:气候操纵方法是否会产生预期的效果?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Passive open-top chambers (OTCs) and rainout shelters (RSs) have been used for over two decades to manipulate temperature and water availabilityin experiments on plant communities. These types of manipulations have been independently evaluated; however, as experiments become more complex and multiple factors are evaluated the potential for unknown or undesirable treatment effects increases. We present the effects of temperature manipulations (with OTCs), water manipulations (with RSs and water additions), and a clipping treatment, implemented in a fully factorialdesign, on soil moisture and temperature over 2 years in a temperate grassland. Temperature was increased 0.2C by OTCs. Soil volumetric watercontent was reduced 3% by RSs and increased 2% by watering. However, clipping vegetation, treatment interactions, and weather conditions also affected soil temperature and moisture. For example, in OTCs RSs increased the temperature an additional 0.4C, watering lowered it 0.4C, and clippingraised temperature 2C. Similarly, changes in soil moisture due to the RSs decreased VWC by 3% and increased 1% by clipping whereas soil moisturedue to watering was reduced 1% by the OTCs and clipping. We also found that OTCs are more effective at raising temperatures on cooler days whensoil temperatures are below 16.3C. Our results suggest that all treatment types generally affect soil variables in predicable ways, but use of such devices should be adopted with caution, as they do not act independently, or exclusively, on the target variables.Key
机译:在植物群落的实验中,被动顶棚(OTC)和防雨棚(RS)已被使用了二十多年,以调节温度和水的利用率。这些类型的操作已被独立评估。然而,随着实验变得更加复杂和评估了多种因素,未知或不良治疗效果的可能性将会增加。我们介绍了温度控制(使用OTC),水处理(使用RS和水添加)和修剪处理(在完全因子设计中实施)对温带草原2年以上的土壤水分和温度的影响。通过OTC将温度升高0.2℃。通过RSs,土壤体积水含量减少了3%,而通过浇水增加了2%。但是,修剪植被,处理相互作用和天气条件也会影响土壤温度和湿度。例如,在OTC中,RS的温度再升高0.4C,浇水使其降低0.4C,温度升高2C。同样,由于RSs,土壤水分的变化通过修剪减少了VWC 3%,增加了1%,而OTCs和修剪减少了因浇水导致的土壤水分1%。我们还发现,在土壤温度低于16.3C的凉爽天气中,OTC在提高温度方面更有效。我们的结果表明,所有处理类型通常都会以可预测的方式影响土壤变量,但应谨慎使用此类设备,因为它们不会独立或仅对目标变量起作用。

著录项

  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 English
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号