...
首页> 外文期刊>Ecosystems >Tracking Soil Temperature and Moisture in a Multi-Factor Climate Experiment in Temperate Grassland: Do Climate Manipulation Methods Produce their Intended Effects?
【24h】

Tracking Soil Temperature and Moisture in a Multi-Factor Climate Experiment in Temperate Grassland: Do Climate Manipulation Methods Produce their Intended Effects?

机译:在温带草原的多因素气候实验中跟踪土壤温度和湿度:气候操纵方法是否会产生预期的效果?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Passive open-top chambers (OTCs) and rainout shelters (RSs) have been used for over two decades to manipulate temperature and water availability in experiments on plant communities. These types of manipulations have been independently evaluated; however, as experiments become more complex and multiple factors are evaluated the potential for unknown or undesirable treatment effects increases. We present the effects of temperature manipulations (with OTCs), water manipulations (with RSs and water additions), and a clipping treatment, implemented in a fully factorial design, on soil moisture and temperature over 2 years in a temperate grassland. Temperature was increased 0.2°C by OTCs. Soil volumetric water content was reduced 3% by RSs and increased 2% by watering. However, clipping vegetation, treatment interactions, and weather conditions also affected soil temperature and moisture. For example, in OTCs RSs increased the temperature an additional 0.4°C, watering lowered it 0.4°C, and clipping raised temperature 2°C. Similarly, changes in soil moisture due to the RSs decreased VWC by 3% and increased 1% by clipping whereas soil moisture due to watering was reduced 1% by the OTCs and clipping. We also found that OTCs are more effective at raising temperatures on cooler days when soil temperatures are below 16.3°C. Our results suggest that all treatment types generally affect soil variables in predicable ways, but use of such devices should be adopted with caution, as they do not act independently, or exclusively, on the target variables.
机译:在植物群落的实验中,被动顶棚(OTC)和防雨棚(RS)已被使用了二十多年,以调节温度和水的利用率。这些类型的操作已被独立评估。然而,随着实验变得更加复杂和评估了多种因素,未知或不良治疗效果的可能性将会增加。我们介绍了温度控制(使用OTC),水处理(使用RS和水添加)和修剪处理(在完全因子设计中实施)对温带草原2年以上的土壤水分和温度的影响。通过OTC将温度升高0.2℃。通过RSs,土壤体积水含量减少了3%,而通过浇水增加了2%。但是,修剪植被,处理相互作用和天气条件也会影响土壤温度和湿度。例如,在OTC中,RS将温度再升高0.4°C,浇水将其降低0.4°C,将温度降低2°C。类似地,由于RSs,土壤水分的变化通过修剪降低了VWC 3%,增加了1%,而OTCs和修剪使浇水导致的土壤水分减少了1%。我们还发现,在土壤温度低于16.3°C的凉爽天气中,OTCs可以更有效地提高温度。我们的结果表明,所有处理类型通常都会以可预测的方式影响土壤变量,但应谨慎使用此类设备,因为它们不会独立或仅对目标变量起作用。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Ecosystems》 |2011年第3期|p.489-502|共14页
  • 作者单位

    Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, 6270 University Blvd., Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z4, Canada;

    Department of Natural Resource Sciences, Thompson Rivers University, 900 McGill Road, PO Box 3010, Kamloops, British Columbia, V2C 5N3, Canada;

    Department of Botany and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, 6270 University Blvd., Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z4, Canada;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    open-top chamber; rainout shelter; climate change; soil volumetric water content; clipping; disturbance;

    机译:敞顶室;雨棚;气候变化;土壤体积水含量;截留;干扰;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号